Independent verification of vendor‐issued dosimetric data for <sup>106</sup> Ru brachytherapy using diode detectors with traceability to external beam standards for absorbed dose to water

Abstract Background Independent verification of the manufacturer‐provided dosimetry data for 106 Ru ophthalmic brachytherapy applicators is crucial for safe and accurate treatment, yet a standardized, traceable method for clinical absolute dosimetry has been lacking. Purpose This work establishes a complete framework for traceable absorbed dose to water measurements of 106 Ru eye plaques in absolute units of Gray, complementing the high‐precision BetaCheck‐106™ setup with a robust detector calibration methodology independent of the source manufacturer. Methods Three microSilicon diode detectors were calibrated in traceable 60 Co and 6 MeV electron reference beams. Depth‐dose measurements for four CCB‐type 106 Ru plaques were performed in water using the BetaCheck‐106™ setup. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were employed to calculate depth‐dependent beam quality correction factors which account for the detector's response in the 106 Ru field relative to the calibration beams. The method was validated against measurements performed at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) using alanine dosimetry. MC simulations were also used to investigate the water‐equivalence of the NPL alanine/PMMA phantom setup. Results The MC‐calculated correction factors for the diodes showed a significant depth‐dependence, underscoring the necessity of such corrections in the steep 106 Ru depth‐dose gradient. The dose rates determined with the calibrated diodes were in agreement with the NPL alanine results. Both methods yielded dose rates systematically lower than those provided in the manufacturer's certificates, though generally within the stated uncertainties. The MC simulations revealed substantial non‐water equivalence correction factors for the alanine/PMMA phantom, highlighting the advantage of direct measurements in water. Conclusions We present a novel, comprehensive methodology for independent and traceable absolute dosimetry of 106 Ru applicators. By combining a dedicated water phantom setup with diode detectors calibrated against external beam standards and MC‐derived correction factors, this framework empowers clinical users to perform robust verification measurements, filling a critical gap in the quality assurance of ocular brachytherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Physics
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70381
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Independent verification of vendor‐issued dosimetric data for 106 Ru brachytherapy using diode detectors with traceability to external beam standards for absorbed dose to water

Åsa Carlsson Tedgren, Ilias Billas, Linda Persson, T Sander et al.
Medical Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Independent verification of vendor‐issued dosimetric data for 106 Ru brachytherapy using diode detectors with traceability to external beam standards for absorbed dose to water

Åsa Carlsson Tedgren, Ilias Billas, Linda Persson, T Sander, Simon Dahlander, G A Bass
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Independent verification of the manufacturer‐provided dosimetry data for 106 Ru ophthalmic brachytherapy applicators is crucial for safe and accurate treatment, yet a standardized, traceable method for clinical absolute dosimetry has been lacking. Purpose This work establishes a complete framework for traceable absorbed dose to water measurements of 106 Ru eye plaques in absolute units of Gray, complementing the high‐precision BetaCheck‐106™ setup with a robust detector calibration methodology independent of the source manufacturer. Methods Three microSilicon diode detectors were calibrated in traceable 60 Co and 6 MeV electron reference beams. Depth‐dose measurements for four CCB‐type 106 Ru plaques were performed in water using the BetaCheck‐106™ setup. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were employed to calculate depth‐dependent beam quality correction factors which account for the detector's response in the 106 Ru field relative to the calibration beams. The method was validated against measurements performed at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) using alanine dosimetry. MC simulations were also used to investigate the water‐equivalence of the NPL alanine/PMMA phantom setup. Results The MC‐calculated correction factors for the diodes showed a significant depth‐dependence, underscoring the necessity of such corrections in the steep 106 Ru depth‐dose gradient. The dose rates determined with the calibrated diodes were in agreement with the NPL alanine results. Both methods yielded dose rates systematically lower than those provided in the manufacturer's certificates, though generally within the stated uncertainties. The MC simulations revealed substantial non‐water equivalence correction factors for the alanine/PMMA phantom, highlighting the advantage of direct measurements in water. Conclusions We present a novel, comprehensive methodology for independent and traceable absolute dosimetry of 106 Ru applicators. By combining a dedicated water phantom setup with diode detectors calibrated against external beam standards and MC‐derived correction factors, this framework empowers clinical users to perform robust verification measurements, filling a critical gap in the quality assurance of ocular brachytherapy.

Medical PhysicsVol. 53(4)
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SE), National Physical Laboratory (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.