3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indispensable for intraoperative guidance and evaluation in pediatric cardiac surgery. While simulation-based medical education offers a promising alternative to the traditional apprenticeship model, evidence directly comparing its efficacy in improving live pediatric TEE performance remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether simulation-based training using a 3D pediatric TEE simulator is superior to traditional apprenticeship training for enhancing clinical TEE proficiency among anesthesia residents. First- through third-year anesthesia resident physicians without prior echocardiography experience were randomized into two groups. All participants first completed a standardized 2-hour web-based foundational course. Subsequently, the intervention group (Simulation group, Group S; n = 22) received 1 h of supervised hands-on practice using the BabyWorks® simulator, while the control group (Traditional group, Group T; n = 22) received 1 h of bedside apprenticeship training on live patients. One week later, all participants were assessed on their ability to independently acquire 11 standardized TEE views in pediatric patients. Performance was scored across three dimensions (imaging angle, anatomical structure, and image clarity), with a maximum total score of 110 points. The total examination duration (time) was also recorded. Baseline knowledge scores were comparable between groups. In the clinical assessment, Group S achieved significantly higher total performance scores than Group T (Group S: 88.60 ± 15.60 vs. Group T: 64.70 ± 16.70; p < 0.001). Group S also demonstrated shorter examination durations (Group S: 447.60s vs. Group T: 584.50s; p = 0.007). Specifically, Group S significantly outperformed Group T in 7 of the 11 anatomical landmarks (p < 0.05), primarily in the technically demanding transgastric and advanced mid-esophageal views. Regarding dimensions, Group S scored higher in angle (p = 0.031), clarity (p < 0.001), and structures (p < 0.001). In summary, this trial provides robust evidence that 3D simulation training significantly improves live TEE performance among novice operators compared to conventional training, contributing valuable insights toward optimizing echocardiography education and enhancing perioperative safety in pediatric cardiac care. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn). Registration number: ChiCTR2500105325. Date of the study first posted on ChiCTR.org.cn: 2025-07-02. Date of the enrolment of the first research participant: 202507-03.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03769-0
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial

Yan Xu, Siyi Zhang, Xien Yang, Gaolong Zhang et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial

Yan Xu, Siyi Zhang, Xien Yang, Gaolong Zhang, Y. Gao, Xinxu Ou, Jianhua Liu, Wei Wei, Na Zhang, Qianqi Qiu
article en

Abstract

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indispensable for intraoperative guidance and evaluation in pediatric cardiac surgery. While simulation-based medical education offers a promising alternative to the traditional apprenticeship model, evidence directly comparing its efficacy in improving live pediatric TEE performance remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether simulation-based training using a 3D pediatric TEE simulator is superior to traditional apprenticeship training for enhancing clinical TEE proficiency among anesthesia residents. First- through third-year anesthesia resident physicians without prior echocardiography experience were randomized into two groups. All participants first completed a standardized 2-hour web-based foundational course. Subsequently, the intervention group (Simulation group, Group S; n = 22) received 1 h of supervised hands-on practice using the BabyWorks® simulator, while the control group (Traditional group, Group T; n = 22) received 1 h of bedside apprenticeship training on live patients. One week later, all participants were assessed on their ability to independently acquire 11 standardized TEE views in pediatric patients. Performance was scored across three dimensions (imaging angle, anatomical structure, and image clarity), with a maximum total score of 110 points. The total examination duration (time) was also recorded. Baseline knowledge scores were comparable between groups. In the clinical assessment, Group S achieved significantly higher total performance scores than Group T (Group S: 88.60 ± 15.60 vs. Group T: 64.70 ± 16.70; p < 0.001). Group S also demonstrated shorter examination durations (Group S: 447.60s vs. Group T: 584.50s; p = 0.007). Specifically, Group S significantly outperformed Group T in 7 of the 11 anatomical landmarks (p < 0.05), primarily in the technically demanding transgastric and advanced mid-esophageal views. Regarding dimensions, Group S scored higher in angle (p = 0.031), clarity (p < 0.001), and structures (p < 0.001). In summary, this trial provides robust evidence that 3D simulation training significantly improves live TEE performance among novice operators compared to conventional training, contributing valuable insights toward optimizing echocardiography education and enhancing perioperative safety in pediatric cardiac care. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn). Registration number: ChiCTR2500105325. Date of the study first posted on ChiCTR.org.cn: 2025-07-02. Date of the enrolment of the first research participant: 202507-03.

BMC Anesthesiology
Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.