Heat capacities of selected battery materials and components

Abstract The specific heat capacities of solid battery materials like active electrode materials and separators were measured from approx. 300–550 K in this study. First, the method was validated by measuring the heat capacities of active anode materials silicon and tin disulfide, which could then be compared to data from literature. The second set of measurements were done on two separator materials (Celgard 2500 and Whatman GF/C), and the results were compared to the heat capacity measurements of pure polypropylene and borosilicate glass from literature. The C p of Celgard 2500 was between of 1.79 and 2.16 J.g −1 K −1 and the Cp of Whatman GF/C was between 0.83 and 0.96 J.g −1 K −1 . In addition, heat capacity values of both types of LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO), disordered LNMO (DLNMO) and ordered LNMO (OLNMO), are reported for the first time, ranging between 0.72–0.90 J.g −1 K −1 and 0.73–0.86 J.g −1 K −1 for DLNMO and OLNMO, respectively. Compared to each other, both DLNMO and OLNMO have similar heat capacities at lower temperatures. However, with increasing temperature, DLNMO starts to have higher heat capacities. Both heat capacities were compared to a heat capacity calculation according to Neumann–Kopp based on the heat capacities of the binary oxides. When compared to the “Parent” material LiMn 2 O 4 (LMO), both DLNMO and OLNMO had lower heat capacities. The data are highly relevant for battery thermal management and for thermal modeling and simulation of lithium-ion batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-026-15452-0
Primary Topic
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat capacities of selected battery materials and components

Hans Flandorfer, Mahmoud Reda
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
article

Heat capacities of selected battery materials and components

Hans Flandorfer, Mahmoud Reda
article en

Abstract

Abstract The specific heat capacities of solid battery materials like active electrode materials and separators were measured from approx. 300–550 K in this study. First, the method was validated by measuring the heat capacities of active anode materials silicon and tin disulfide, which could then be compared to data from literature. The second set of measurements were done on two separator materials (Celgard 2500 and Whatman GF/C), and the results were compared to the heat capacity measurements of pure polypropylene and borosilicate glass from literature. The C p of Celgard 2500 was between of 1.79 and 2.16 J.g −1 K −1 and the Cp of Whatman GF/C was between 0.83 and 0.96 J.g −1 K −1 . In addition, heat capacity values of both types of LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO), disordered LNMO (DLNMO) and ordered LNMO (OLNMO), are reported for the first time, ranging between 0.72–0.90 J.g −1 K −1 and 0.73–0.86 J.g −1 K −1 for DLNMO and OLNMO, respectively. Compared to each other, both DLNMO and OLNMO have similar heat capacities at lower temperatures. However, with increasing temperature, DLNMO starts to have higher heat capacities. Both heat capacities were compared to a heat capacity calculation according to Neumann–Kopp based on the heat capacities of the binary oxides. When compared to the “Parent” material LiMn 2 O 4 (LMO), both DLNMO and OLNMO had lower heat capacities. The data are highly relevant for battery thermal management and for thermal modeling and simulation of lithium-ion batteries.

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
University of Vienna (AT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.