Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Gram‐Negative Bacteria: A Solid Medium‐Based Method Analysis

ABSTRACT Extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by gram‐negative bacteria have gained increased scientific interest over the last years due to a growing understanding of their roles in pathogenesis and biotechnological potential. However, isolating such nanoparticles is technically challenging. Here, we evaluated a rapid and reproducible protocol for EV isolation from bacteria grown on solid medium, specifically analyzing Gram‐negative species within the genera Acinetobacter , Aeromonas , Escherichia , Enterobacter , Klebsiella , and Pseudomonas . In addition to avoiding large culture volumes, the method was reproducible, relatively fast, compatible with multiple downstream analyses, including flow cytometry, TEM, and NTA, while yielding strain‐specific nanoparticle profiles with acceptable purity. Our results also show that Pseudomonas and Aeromonas strains were the highest and lowest EV producers, respectively. Although the method frequently co‐isolated filaments, clean isolates were also obtained. Comparison of EV isolation from cells grown on solid medium with those grown in liquid cultures showed that solid growth consistently yielded more nanoparticles. The methodology represents a valuable approach for bacterial EV isolation and may serve as an important initial step in EV research workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jex2.70130
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Gram‐Negative Bacteria: A Solid Medium‐Based Method Analysis

Leonardo Nimrichter, Juliana Rizzo, Bruna Montalvão, Stefanie Camargo da Costa et al.
Journal of Extracellular Biology
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
article

Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Gram‐Negative Bacteria: A Solid Medium‐Based Method Analysis

Leonardo Nimrichter, Juliana Rizzo, Bruna Montalvão, Stefanie Camargo da Costa, Anderson Sousa Cabral, Marcio L. Rodrigues, Roberto G. M. Guardatti, Jhonatha R. Cordeiro‐Moura, Flávia G. C. Reis, Renata C. Picão, Jhon J. Artunduaga Bonilla
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by gram‐negative bacteria have gained increased scientific interest over the last years due to a growing understanding of their roles in pathogenesis and biotechnological potential. However, isolating such nanoparticles is technically challenging. Here, we evaluated a rapid and reproducible protocol for EV isolation from bacteria grown on solid medium, specifically analyzing Gram‐negative species within the genera Acinetobacter , Aeromonas , Escherichia , Enterobacter , Klebsiella , and Pseudomonas . In addition to avoiding large culture volumes, the method was reproducible, relatively fast, compatible with multiple downstream analyses, including flow cytometry, TEM, and NTA, while yielding strain‐specific nanoparticle profiles with acceptable purity. Our results also show that Pseudomonas and Aeromonas strains were the highest and lowest EV producers, respectively. Although the method frequently co‐isolated filaments, clean isolates were also obtained. Comparison of EV isolation from cells grown on solid medium with those grown in liquid cultures showed that solid growth consistently yielded more nanoparticles. The methodology represents a valuable approach for bacterial EV isolation and may serve as an important initial step in EV research workflow.

Journal of Extracellular BiologyVol. 5(4)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics (CZ), Fundação Carlos Chagas (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.