Associations of tear film characteristics with contact lens discomfort during daily disposable wear of contact lens polymers

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Purpose</h3> This study investigated tear film parameters during the wear of two daily disposable contact lenses composed of different polymers and examined their association with symptoms of contact lens discomfort. <h3>Methods</h3> A prospective, randomized, investigator-masked crossover study was conducted over two months with 20 participants wearing Somofilcon A or Verofilcon A daily disposable lenses. Tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), and lipid layer thickness (LLT) were measured at the beginning of the study and after one month of wearing each lens type, both with lenses in-situ and after removal following at least six hours of wear. Symptoms were assessed using the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Differences in parameters between lens types and time points were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Associations between tear film parameters and subjective comfort scores were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. <h3>Results</h3> The NITBUT-average significantly improved with Verofilcon A (12.98 ± 4.27 s; p < 0.001) and Somofilcon A (12.30 ± 3.46 s; p < 0.001) compared to baseline (9.31 ± 3.29 s), with no significant difference between the lenses (p = 0.456). Significant changes in VAS comfort and CLDEQ-8 scores from baseline were observed for both lens types (p < 0.001). For Verofilcon A, CLDEQ-8 scores decreased, and VAS comfort increased while CLDEQ-8 scores negatively correlating with NITBUT-first break (r = −0.4637, p = 0.0455) and NITBUT-average (r = −0.5758, p < 0.001). i.e. a smaller CLDEQ-8 score (better comfort) associated with longer NITBUT.During Somofilcon A wear, CLDEQ-8 increased, and VAS comfort scores decreased, and VAS negatively correlated with NITBUT-first break (r = −0.5334, p = 0.018) and TMH (r = −0.4856, p = 0.0351). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Whilst better comfort with Verofilcon A was associated with improved NITBUT, correlations were moderate, and further studies are required to draw stronger conclusions. LLT showed no association with symptoms. Lens material and surface properties, along with ocular surface factors likely influence comfort outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2026.102648
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of tear film characteristics with contact lens discomfort during daily disposable wear of contact lens polymers

Simin Masoudi, Ajay Kumar Vijay, Mukesh Kumar, Mark D. P. Willcox et al.
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Associations of tear film characteristics with contact lens discomfort during daily disposable wear of contact lens polymers

Simin Masoudi, Ajay Kumar Vijay, Mukesh Kumar, Mark D. P. Willcox, Ankit Raj, Thomas John Naduvilath, Srikanth Dumpati
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Purpose</h3> This study investigated tear film parameters during the wear of two daily disposable contact lenses composed of different polymers and examined their association with symptoms of contact lens discomfort. <h3>Methods</h3> A prospective, randomized, investigator-masked crossover study was conducted over two months with 20 participants wearing Somofilcon A or Verofilcon A daily disposable lenses. Tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), and lipid layer thickness (LLT) were measured at the beginning of the study and after one month of wearing each lens type, both with lenses in-situ and after removal following at least six hours of wear. Symptoms were assessed using the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Differences in parameters between lens types and time points were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Associations between tear film parameters and subjective comfort scores were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. <h3>Results</h3> The NITBUT-average significantly improved with Verofilcon A (12.98 ± 4.27 s; p < 0.001) and Somofilcon A (12.30 ± 3.46 s; p < 0.001) compared to baseline (9.31 ± 3.29 s), with no significant difference between the lenses (p = 0.456). Significant changes in VAS comfort and CLDEQ-8 scores from baseline were observed for both lens types (p < 0.001). For Verofilcon A, CLDEQ-8 scores decreased, and VAS comfort increased while CLDEQ-8 scores negatively correlating with NITBUT-first break (r = −0.4637, p = 0.0455) and NITBUT-average (r = −0.5758, p < 0.001). i.e. a smaller CLDEQ-8 score (better comfort) associated with longer NITBUT.During Somofilcon A wear, CLDEQ-8 increased, and VAS comfort scores decreased, and VAS negatively correlated with NITBUT-first break (r = −0.5334, p = 0.018) and TMH (r = −0.4856, p = 0.0351). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Whilst better comfort with Verofilcon A was associated with improved NITBUT, correlations were moderate, and further studies are required to draw stronger conclusions. LLT showed no association with symptoms. Lens material and surface properties, along with ocular surface factors likely influence comfort outcomes.

Contact Lens and Anterior EyeVol. 49(3)
L V Prasad Eye Institute (IN), Brien Holden Vision Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.