D-dimer levels and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

The study investigates the influence of D-dimer levels on the prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The prognostic impact of D-dimer levels has not yet been investigated in patients with HFmrEF. We retrospectively included consecutive patients with HFmrEF at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided in quartiles according to their D-dimer levels, further sub-analyses were performed after excluding patients with conditions associated with increased D-dimer levels. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up), key secondary endpoint was the risk of heart failure (HF)-related rehospitalization. In total, 1126 patients with HFmrEF were included with a median D-dimer level of 0.87 µg/mL (interquartile range 0.42–2.19 µg/mL). Higher D-dimer levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (Q4 vs. Q1: hazard ratio (HR) 6.817; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.401–10.561, p = 0.001), which was still observed after multivariable adjustment (Q4 vs. Q1: adjusted (a)HR 3.228; 95% CI 1.901–5.479; p = 0.001). This association was still observed after excluding patients with conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels. Elevated D-dimer levels were independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in HFmrEF patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101915
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D-dimer levels and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Marielen Reinhardt, Felix Lau, Kathrin Weidner, Michelle Goertz et al.
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

D-dimer levels and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Marielen Reinhardt, Felix Lau, Kathrin Weidner, Michelle Goertz, Finn Ole Kronberg, Noah Abel, Alexander Schmitt, Thomas Bertsch, Michael Behnes, Mohammad Abumayyaleh, Tobias Schupp, Ibrahim Akin
article en

Abstract

The study investigates the influence of D-dimer levels on the prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The prognostic impact of D-dimer levels has not yet been investigated in patients with HFmrEF. We retrospectively included consecutive patients with HFmrEF at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided in quartiles according to their D-dimer levels, further sub-analyses were performed after excluding patients with conditions associated with increased D-dimer levels. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up), key secondary endpoint was the risk of heart failure (HF)-related rehospitalization. In total, 1126 patients with HFmrEF were included with a median D-dimer level of 0.87 µg/mL (interquartile range 0.42–2.19 µg/mL). Higher D-dimer levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (Q4 vs. Q1: hazard ratio (HR) 6.817; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.401–10.561, p = 0.001), which was still observed after multivariable adjustment (Q4 vs. Q1: adjusted (a)HR 3.228; 95% CI 1.901–5.479; p = 0.001). This association was still observed after excluding patients with conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels. Elevated D-dimer levels were independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in HFmrEF patients.

IJC Heart & VasculatureVol. 64
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Nuremberg Hospital (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.