Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™): Category Ownership Manifesto (Version 1.2) JDO-2026-001

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) establishes a new governance discipline focused on making human decision-making behavior visible within AI-supported and operational justice environments. While existing approaches emphasize system outputs, compliance, and post-incident analysis, they do not account for how decisions are interpreted, formed, and executed in real-world conditions. This manifesto defines the previously unstructured layer between signal and outcome, where authority is exercised and risk accumulates. By naming and framing this gap, Justice Decision Observability™ introduces a foundational shift from system-level oversight to execution-layer governance. This document establishes the field, asserts category ownership, and defines the need for structured approaches to observing, reconstructing, and governing decision environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19322332
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™): Category Ownership Manifesto (Version 1.2) JDO-2026-001

Stephanie Fleming, Janna M. Broaddus
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™): Category Ownership Manifesto (Version 1.2) JDO-2026-001

Stephanie Fleming, Janna M. Broaddus
article en

Abstract

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) establishes a new governance discipline focused on making human decision-making behavior visible within AI-supported and operational justice environments. While existing approaches emphasize system outputs, compliance, and post-incident analysis, they do not account for how decisions are interpreted, formed, and executed in real-world conditions. This manifesto defines the previously unstructured layer between signal and outcome, where authority is exercised and risk accumulates. By naming and framing this gap, Justice Decision Observability™ introduces a foundational shift from system-level oversight to execution-layer governance. This document establishes the field, asserts category ownership, and defines the need for structured approaches to observing, reconstructing, and governing decision environments.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
United States Department of Justice (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™): Category Ownership Manifesto (Version 1.2) JDO-2026-001 — Stephanie Fleming, Janna M. Broaddus · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS