Understanding Child-to-Child Harm: A National Analysis of Child Protection Responses

Children may experience harm in diverse family contexts, including circumstances in which other young household members engage in harmful behaviors toward them. Despite child-initiated harm being prevalent and causing significant developmental impacts, these cases present unique challenges for recognition in current legal frameworks designed for adult perpetrators. This study examined patterns in substantiated reports involving children who harmed other children (CHOC) using National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System administrative data from 2018 to 2019. We documented state statutory and policy variations in recognizing minors as perpetrators and corresponding identification rates; compared report and perpetrator characteristics between CHOC reports versus adult-perpetrated cases using descriptive statistics; and examined differences in CHOC cases by the presence of sexual abuse allegations. Among more than 885,000 substantiated reports, 2.4% involved CHOC, with state rates ranging from 0.2% to 9.7%, corresponding to state definitional frameworks. Reports involving CHOC differed significantly from adult-perpetrated cases: Victims were typically older and without siblings, reports more often originated from parents and mental health personnel, and foster care placement occurred less frequently. When CHOC had adult coperpetrators, these adults were younger and showed elevated sexual abuse rates compared with adult-only perpetrator cases, yet they primarily committed neglect whereas their CHOC predominantly committed sexual abuse. Among CHOC reports, those with sexual abuse allegations disproportionately involved White families, older victims, and CHOC who were younger, male, and often related to the victim. Findings show substantial cross-state policy variation and distinct report characteristics requiring targeted responses, highlighting opportunities for developmentally appropriate, trauma-informed, and family-centered interventions addressing the needs of both CHOC and victims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261429552
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Child-to-Child Harm: A National Analysis of Child Protection Responses

Keunhye Park, Joana Tolchinsky, L. E. Palmer, Eunhye Ahn et al.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Understanding Child-to-Child Harm: A National Analysis of Child Protection Responses

Keunhye Park, Joana Tolchinsky, L. E. Palmer, Eunhye Ahn, Andrea Lane Eastman
article en

Abstract

Children may experience harm in diverse family contexts, including circumstances in which other young household members engage in harmful behaviors toward them. Despite child-initiated harm being prevalent and causing significant developmental impacts, these cases present unique challenges for recognition in current legal frameworks designed for adult perpetrators. This study examined patterns in substantiated reports involving children who harmed other children (CHOC) using National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System administrative data from 2018 to 2019. We documented state statutory and policy variations in recognizing minors as perpetrators and corresponding identification rates; compared report and perpetrator characteristics between CHOC reports versus adult-perpetrated cases using descriptive statistics; and examined differences in CHOC cases by the presence of sexual abuse allegations. Among more than 885,000 substantiated reports, 2.4% involved CHOC, with state rates ranging from 0.2% to 9.7%, corresponding to state definitional frameworks. Reports involving CHOC differed significantly from adult-perpetrated cases: Victims were typically older and without siblings, reports more often originated from parents and mental health personnel, and foster care placement occurred less frequently. When CHOC had adult coperpetrators, these adults were younger and showed elevated sexual abuse rates compared with adult-only perpetrator cases, yet they primarily committed neglect whereas their CHOC predominantly committed sexual abuse. Among CHOC reports, those with sexual abuse allegations disproportionately involved White families, older victims, and CHOC who were younger, male, and often related to the victim. Findings show substantial cross-state policy variation and distinct report characteristics requiring targeted responses, highlighting opportunities for developmentally appropriate, trauma-informed, and family-centered interventions addressing the needs of both CHOC and victims.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of Southern California (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Utah (US), Michigan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.