Equity in and through transdisciplinary design research: Towards a pluriversal ethics of engagement for transcultural collaborations

Transdisciplinary design research can embed equity in and through its collaborative approaches by genuinely engaging communities and stakeholders in the context of Global North–Global South projects. However, such approaches can fail to address inequities prior to engagement, undermining oppressed groups’ agency and limiting researchers’ capacity for authentic transcultural collaboration, thereby risking tokenistic interventions. This research note contributes to debates on how equitable collaborations and mutual learning can be (co)designed to tackle the re-enactment of oppression in and through design research. The study draws on semi-structured interviews with 11 researchers experienced in transdisciplinary design research within Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) projects to identify challenges and best practices in transcultural collaborative processes, alongside a purposive literature review spanning decolonial design, cultural studies, critical pedagogy, social justice, and philosophy. Our findings outline a future agenda underpinned by a pluriversal ethics of engagement, which entails considerations for co-designing equitable engagement and mutual learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Designing
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497671261435972
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in and through transdisciplinary design research: Towards a pluriversal ethics of engagement for transcultural collaborations

Mariana Fonseca Braga, Emmanuel Tsekleves
Designing
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Equity in and through transdisciplinary design research: Towards a pluriversal ethics of engagement for transcultural collaborations

Mariana Fonseca Braga, Emmanuel Tsekleves
article en

Abstract

Transdisciplinary design research can embed equity in and through its collaborative approaches by genuinely engaging communities and stakeholders in the context of Global North–Global South projects. However, such approaches can fail to address inequities prior to engagement, undermining oppressed groups’ agency and limiting researchers’ capacity for authentic transcultural collaboration, thereby risking tokenistic interventions. This research note contributes to debates on how equitable collaborations and mutual learning can be (co)designed to tackle the re-enactment of oppression in and through design research. The study draws on semi-structured interviews with 11 researchers experienced in transdisciplinary design research within Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) projects to identify challenges and best practices in transcultural collaborative processes, alongside a purposive literature review spanning decolonial design, cultural studies, critical pedagogy, social justice, and philosophy. Our findings outline a future agenda underpinned by a pluriversal ethics of engagement, which entails considerations for co-designing equitable engagement and mutual learning.

Designing
University of Salford (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.