Archiving Knowledge : Digital Materialities, Affordances, and Challenges in Opening up Digital 3D Data for Reuse

Archaeology’s turn to digital documentation poses questions for the long-term preservation of archaeological data and their future re-use—questions that have relevance also for the debates about open science and data archivization in the natural and social sciences. In this paper, I investigate how the nexus of epistemology and digital materialities affect attempts to open up archaeological data for future users. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, in-depth interviews, and text analysis, I show how the epistemological positions assumed by archaeologists in relation to epistemic virtues such as objectivity, interpretation, and transparency lead them to adopt diverging understandings of what the material affordances and limitations of digital 3D technology mean for the value and feasibility of opening up digital archaeological data. Supported by the analysis, I argue that the contemporary debate about data reuse and archiving in archaeology offers valuable insights into questions of openness, reuse, and archivization across the sciences. First, because the arguments put forth in the debate highlight important obstacles on the road to open data, and second, because the frictions that arise when archives designed to house physical things are confronted with digital objects make visible the translations involved in transforming epistemic objects into archivable entities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2026-03-20
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archiving Knowledge : Digital Materialities, Affordances, and Challenges in Opening up Digital 3D Data for Reuse

Tobias Olofsson
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Archiving Knowledge : Digital Materialities, Affordances, and Challenges in Opening up Digital 3D Data for Reuse

Tobias Olofsson
article en

Abstract

Archaeology’s turn to digital documentation poses questions for the long-term preservation of archaeological data and their future re-use—questions that have relevance also for the debates about open science and data archivization in the natural and social sciences. In this paper, I investigate how the nexus of epistemology and digital materialities affect attempts to open up archaeological data for future users. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, in-depth interviews, and text analysis, I show how the epistemological positions assumed by archaeologists in relation to epistemic virtues such as objectivity, interpretation, and transparency lead them to adopt diverging understandings of what the material affordances and limitations of digital 3D technology mean for the value and feasibility of opening up digital archaeological data. Supported by the analysis, I argue that the contemporary debate about data reuse and archiving in archaeology offers valuable insights into questions of openness, reuse, and archivization across the sciences. First, because the arguments put forth in the debate highlight important obstacles on the road to open data, and second, because the frictions that arise when archives designed to house physical things are confronted with digital objects make visible the translations involved in transforming epistemic objects into archivable entities.

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.