Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations

Matthieu Vincenot,1,2,* Martine Bordeleau,1,2,* Flore le Blanc,1,2 Catherine Pagé,1 Isabelle Gaumond,3 Guillaume Léonard,1,2 Serge Marchand4 1Research Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 2School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 3Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 4Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Guillaume Léonard, Research Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 1036 rue Belvédère Sud, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H4C4, Canada, Email [email protected] Serge Marchand, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5H3, Canada, Email [email protected]: Pain perception varies considerably between individuals, with sex differences likely contributing to this variability. These differences appear to involve multiple factors, including sex hormones, although the underlying mechanisms of modulation remain unclear.Purpose: To explore how variations in free testosterone influence pain perception and modulation mechanisms in men.Patients and Methods: A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used to recruit a total of 12 men with low testosterone and 16 controls for this cross-sectional experimental study. Pain sensitivity was evaluated via heat pain threshold (HPT) and heat pain tolerance (HPTol) using a contact thermode placed on the left forearm. Pain modulation was assessed through conditioned pain modulation (CPM) responses using a counter-irritation protocol with heat pain stimulation as test stimuli applied before and after a cold pressor test serving as the conditioning stimulus. Temporal summation of pain (TSP) was assessed using 2 minutes constant heat pain stimulation.Results: Pain perception (HPT and HPTol) was significantly lower in low testosterone compared to controls (p = 0.02). Free testosterone levels were positively correlated with HPTol (r = 0.40, p = 0.03). Pain modulation responses were similar in low-testosterone and those in the control group. No significant between-groups differences were observed for CPM and TSP responses (all p > 0.90).Conclusion: Control men showed lower pain sensitivity than low-testosterone participants, supporting an antinociceptive effect of testosterone that may partly contribute to sex differences in pain.Keywords: pain perception, pain threshold, pain modulation, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, sex hormones, testosterone, men

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-03-01
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations

Marchand S, Leonard G., Gaumond I, Pagé C et al.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Hormonal and reproductive studies
article

Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations

Marchand S, Leonard G., Gaumond I, Pagé C, le Blanc F, Vincenot M, Bordeleau M
article en

Abstract

Matthieu Vincenot,1,2,* Martine Bordeleau,1,2,* Flore le Blanc,1,2 Catherine Pagé,1 Isabelle Gaumond,3 Guillaume Léonard,1,2 Serge Marchand4 1Research Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 2School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 3Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; 4Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Guillaume Léonard, Research Centre on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 1036 rue Belvédère Sud, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H4C4, Canada, Email [email protected] Serge Marchand, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5H3, Canada, Email [email protected]: Pain perception varies considerably between individuals, with sex differences likely contributing to this variability. These differences appear to involve multiple factors, including sex hormones, although the underlying mechanisms of modulation remain unclear.Purpose: To explore how variations in free testosterone influence pain perception and modulation mechanisms in men.Patients and Methods: A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used to recruit a total of 12 men with low testosterone and 16 controls for this cross-sectional experimental study. Pain sensitivity was evaluated via heat pain threshold (HPT) and heat pain tolerance (HPTol) using a contact thermode placed on the left forearm. Pain modulation was assessed through conditioned pain modulation (CPM) responses using a counter-irritation protocol with heat pain stimulation as test stimuli applied before and after a cold pressor test serving as the conditioning stimulus. Temporal summation of pain (TSP) was assessed using 2 minutes constant heat pain stimulation.Results: Pain perception (HPT and HPTol) was significantly lower in low testosterone compared to controls (p = 0.02). Free testosterone levels were positively correlated with HPTol (r = 0.40, p = 0.03). Pain modulation responses were similar in low-testosterone and those in the control group. No significant between-groups differences were observed for CPM and TSP responses (all p > 0.90).Conclusion: Control men showed lower pain sensitivity than low-testosterone participants, supporting an antinociceptive effect of testosterone that may partly contribute to sex differences in pain.Keywords: pain perception, pain threshold, pain modulation, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, sex hormones, testosterone, men

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.