Evaluation of the Accuracy of Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas Based on Anterior Corneal Measurements

Yukihiro Matsumoto1,2 1Eye Care Clinic, Soka, Saitama, Japan; 2Eye Care Clinic Tokyo, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Yukihiro Matsumoto, Eye Care Clinic, Soka, Saitama, Japan, Email [email protected]: We aimed to evaluate the postoperative refractive astigmatism prediction error (RAPE) of three modern toric intraocular lens (IOL) formulas, which estimate posterior corneal astigmatism, using anterior corneal measurements with a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer, ARGOS® (ARGOS).Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 33 eyes of 33 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery implanted with Clareon toric IOLs (model CNW0Tx) using digital guidance. Back-calculation was performed using the KANE toric, Emmetropic Verifying Optical (EVO) toric v2.0, and Barrett toric IOL formulas employing preoperative measurements with the ARGOS biometer, and surgically induced astigmatism was set to 0 diopter (D). RAPE was defined as the difference between the predicted refractive astigmatism and actual subjective refractive astigmatism 1 month after surgery. The Wilcox–Holladay–Wang–Koch statistical method was used to compare the toric IOL formulas.Results: Mean and standard deviation (SD) of RAPE for KANE toric, EVO toric, and Barrett toric formulas were − 0.02 ± 0.44 D (95% CI: − 0.18 to 0.14), 0.03 ± 0.44 D (95% CI: − 0.13 to 0.19), and 0.03 ± 0.43 D (95% CI: − 0.12 to 0.18), respectively. The median absolute RAPE were 0.20 D for the KANE toric, 0.23 D for the EVO toric, and 0.27 D for the Barrett toric. The centroid and SD of RAPE for each toric formula were 0.09 ± 0.46 D at 3.25°, 0.04 ± 0.50 D at 172.34°, and 0.02 ± 0.45 D at 103.50°, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the Barrett toric and KANE toric in the x axis (p = 0.001).Conclusion: This study provides a further evaluation of the accuracy of modern toric IOL formulas for astigmatism prediction, even though only anterior corneal measurements from ARGOS were used for toric IOL calculations.Keywords: toric intraocular lens, astigmatism, refractive prediction error, biometry

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-03-01
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas Based on Anterior Corneal Measurements

Matsumoto Y.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas Based on Anterior Corneal Measurements

Matsumoto Y.
article en

Abstract

Yukihiro Matsumoto1,2 1Eye Care Clinic, Soka, Saitama, Japan; 2Eye Care Clinic Tokyo, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Yukihiro Matsumoto, Eye Care Clinic, Soka, Saitama, Japan, Email [email protected]: We aimed to evaluate the postoperative refractive astigmatism prediction error (RAPE) of three modern toric intraocular lens (IOL) formulas, which estimate posterior corneal astigmatism, using anterior corneal measurements with a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer, ARGOS® (ARGOS).Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 33 eyes of 33 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery implanted with Clareon toric IOLs (model CNW0Tx) using digital guidance. Back-calculation was performed using the KANE toric, Emmetropic Verifying Optical (EVO) toric v2.0, and Barrett toric IOL formulas employing preoperative measurements with the ARGOS biometer, and surgically induced astigmatism was set to 0 diopter (D). RAPE was defined as the difference between the predicted refractive astigmatism and actual subjective refractive astigmatism 1 month after surgery. The Wilcox–Holladay–Wang–Koch statistical method was used to compare the toric IOL formulas.Results: Mean and standard deviation (SD) of RAPE for KANE toric, EVO toric, and Barrett toric formulas were − 0.02 ± 0.44 D (95% CI: − 0.18 to 0.14), 0.03 ± 0.44 D (95% CI: − 0.13 to 0.19), and 0.03 ± 0.43 D (95% CI: − 0.12 to 0.18), respectively. The median absolute RAPE were 0.20 D for the KANE toric, 0.23 D for the EVO toric, and 0.27 D for the Barrett toric. The centroid and SD of RAPE for each toric formula were 0.09 ± 0.46 D at 3.25°, 0.04 ± 0.50 D at 172.34°, and 0.02 ± 0.45 D at 103.50°, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the Barrett toric and KANE toric in the x axis (p = 0.001).Conclusion: This study provides a further evaluation of the accuracy of modern toric IOL formulas for astigmatism prediction, even though only anterior corneal measurements from ARGOS were used for toric IOL calculations.Keywords: toric intraocular lens, astigmatism, refractive prediction error, biometry

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas Based on Anterior Corneal Measurements — Matsumoto Y. · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS