Best Evidence Summary of Preoperative Management for Patients Undergoing Intestinal Stoma Surgery

Mingming Zhong,1,2 Yiming Shi,1,2 Lianghong Huang,1,2 Biying Liu,1,2 Jiating Jiang,1,2 Qiujun Cao1,2 1Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China; 2JBI Zhongshan Hospital Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Qiujun Cao, Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: To retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence on preoperative management for patients with intestinal stomas, and to provide a foundation for clinical nursing practice.Methods: This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing. The PIPOST framework was used to establish the clinical question. A systematic search was performed according to the 6S evidence hierarchy across international and Chinese databases and guideline repositories from inception to July 31, 2025. Eligible evidence included clinical decision support documents, clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements, position statements, organizational standards, and evidence summaries published in Chinese or English. Methodological quality was appraised using appropriate tools based on evidence type, and evidence was extracted, synthesized, and graded according to established evidence-based criteria.Results: A total of 46 evidence sources were included, comprising 5 clinical decision support documents, 10 clinical practice guidelines, 14 evidence summaries, 9 systematic reviews, 4 expert consensus statements, 3 position statements, and 1 organizational standard. Based on evidence synthesis and consultation with clinical professionals, 22 pieces of evidence were summarized across four domains: organizational preparation, comprehensive assessment, counselling and education, and stoma site marking.Conclusion: This evidence summary provides an evidence-based framework to guide standardized and individualized preoperative care, aiming to improve surgical preparedness and postoperative outcomes. Further research is needed to update the evidence base and evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of these recommendations in clinical practice.Keywords: intestinal stoma, preoperative management, evidence summary, nursing care, stoma site marking

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-03-01
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Evidence Summary of Preoperative Management for Patients Undergoing Intestinal Stoma Surgery

Huang L, Shi Y, Zhong M, Liu B et al.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Stoma care and complications
article

Best Evidence Summary of Preoperative Management for Patients Undergoing Intestinal Stoma Surgery

Huang L, Shi Y, Zhong M, Liu B, Cao Q, Jiang J
article en

Abstract

Mingming Zhong,1,2 Yiming Shi,1,2 Lianghong Huang,1,2 Biying Liu,1,2 Jiating Jiang,1,2 Qiujun Cao1,2 1Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China; 2JBI Zhongshan Hospital Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Qiujun Cao, Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: To retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence on preoperative management for patients with intestinal stomas, and to provide a foundation for clinical nursing practice.Methods: This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing. The PIPOST framework was used to establish the clinical question. A systematic search was performed according to the 6S evidence hierarchy across international and Chinese databases and guideline repositories from inception to July 31, 2025. Eligible evidence included clinical decision support documents, clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements, position statements, organizational standards, and evidence summaries published in Chinese or English. Methodological quality was appraised using appropriate tools based on evidence type, and evidence was extracted, synthesized, and graded according to established evidence-based criteria.Results: A total of 46 evidence sources were included, comprising 5 clinical decision support documents, 10 clinical practice guidelines, 14 evidence summaries, 9 systematic reviews, 4 expert consensus statements, 3 position statements, and 1 organizational standard. Based on evidence synthesis and consultation with clinical professionals, 22 pieces of evidence were summarized across four domains: organizational preparation, comprehensive assessment, counselling and education, and stoma site marking.Conclusion: This evidence summary provides an evidence-based framework to guide standardized and individualized preoperative care, aiming to improve surgical preparedness and postoperative outcomes. Further research is needed to update the evidence base and evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of these recommendations in clinical practice.Keywords: intestinal stoma, preoperative management, evidence summary, nursing care, stoma site marking

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Stoma care and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.