Drawing and Material Visibility in Video Learning: Examining Drawing Quality as a Mediator

ABSTRACT Drawing is widely advocated as an active learning strategy; however, its effectiveness in video‐based learning remains inconsistent. One potential explanation lies in material visibility, whether learning materials remain accessible during task performance. Using a 2 (drawing vs. passive viewing) × 2 (visible vs. no visible) experimental design, this study examined the effects of drawing and material visibility on cognitive load, learning satisfaction, immediate and delayed performance, and metacognitive accuracy. We further tested whether drawing quality mediated the relationship between instructional condition and learning outcomes. Results revealed a significant interaction between drawing and material visibility. Drawing enhanced learning performance primarily when materials were visible, whereas its benefits were attenuated under no visible conditions. Material visibility positively influenced learning outcomes indirectly through improved drawing quality. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of drawing depends on access to learning materials and highlight the importance of considering cognitive load constraints in generative learning tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70192
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing and Material Visibility in Video Learning: Examining Drawing Quality as a Mediator

Youqi Zhang, J. Joshua Yang, Zhongling Pi, Ke Xu et al.
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Drawing and Material Visibility in Video Learning: Examining Drawing Quality as a Mediator

Youqi Zhang, J. Joshua Yang, Zhongling Pi, Ke Xu, Qihui Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing is widely advocated as an active learning strategy; however, its effectiveness in video‐based learning remains inconsistent. One potential explanation lies in material visibility, whether learning materials remain accessible during task performance. Using a 2 (drawing vs. passive viewing) × 2 (visible vs. no visible) experimental design, this study examined the effects of drawing and material visibility on cognitive load, learning satisfaction, immediate and delayed performance, and metacognitive accuracy. We further tested whether drawing quality mediated the relationship between instructional condition and learning outcomes. Results revealed a significant interaction between drawing and material visibility. Drawing enhanced learning performance primarily when materials were visible, whereas its benefits were attenuated under no visible conditions. Material visibility positively influenced learning outcomes indirectly through improved drawing quality. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of drawing depends on access to learning materials and highlight the importance of considering cognitive load constraints in generative learning tasks.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(2)
Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Central China Normal University (CN), Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drawing and Material Visibility in Video Learning: Examining Drawing Quality as a Mediator — Youqi Zhang, J. Joshua Yang, et al. · Applied Cognitive Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS