The Effect of Alternative Sheep–Beef Enterprise Mixes on Farm Productivity, Profitability and Predicted Enteric Methane Emissions in North Island Hill Country Farms

Sheep or beef cattle (cattle) share of total farm feed consumed, measured in stock units (SU) on New Zealand farms, is often adjusted depending on the profitability of each enterprise. The impact of these adjustments on whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted methane (CH 4 ) output has not been recently explored. A system dynamics model of a representative North Island Hill Country sheep and beef farm was parameterised to evaluate whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted CH 4 output simultaneously, while varying sheep and cattle SU. Five scenarios were considered: 80%:20%, 60%:40%, 50%:50%, 40%:60% and 20%:80% sheep and cattle SU, respectively. For every 20% increase in cattle SU, on average, total liveweight and carcass weight equivalent (kg CWeq) sold increased by 0.5% and 3.3%, respectively, while cash operating surplus (COS) increased by 10%. However, predicted total enteric CH 4 emissions increased by 2.2%, due to fewer lambs in the system, which have a lower emission factor, and farm economic emission efficiency (COS($NZ)/tCO 2 e) increased by 7.5%. Overall, the results show that to increase COS, farmers should increase cattle SU. Although when considering a transition towards a higher proportion of cattle SU in the mixed system, they should also consider pasture management and environmental implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jag2.70058
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Alternative Sheep–Beef Enterprise Mixes on Farm Productivity, Profitability and Predicted Enteric Methane Emissions in North Island Hill Country Farms

Peter R. Tozer, P. C. H. Morel, Joseph Ayetewene Adjabui, P. R. Kenyon et al.
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

The Effect of Alternative Sheep–Beef Enterprise Mixes on Farm Productivity, Profitability and Predicted Enteric Methane Emissions in North Island Hill Country Farms

Peter R. Tozer, P. C. H. Morel, Joseph Ayetewene Adjabui, P. R. Kenyon, Thiagarajah Ramilan, Stephen T. Morris
article en

Abstract

Sheep or beef cattle (cattle) share of total farm feed consumed, measured in stock units (SU) on New Zealand farms, is often adjusted depending on the profitability of each enterprise. The impact of these adjustments on whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted methane (CH 4 ) output has not been recently explored. A system dynamics model of a representative North Island Hill Country sheep and beef farm was parameterised to evaluate whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted CH 4 output simultaneously, while varying sheep and cattle SU. Five scenarios were considered: 80%:20%, 60%:40%, 50%:50%, 40%:60% and 20%:80% sheep and cattle SU, respectively. For every 20% increase in cattle SU, on average, total liveweight and carcass weight equivalent (kg CWeq) sold increased by 0.5% and 3.3%, respectively, while cash operating surplus (COS) increased by 10%. However, predicted total enteric CH 4 emissions increased by 2.2%, due to fewer lambs in the system, which have a lower emission factor, and farm economic emission efficiency (COS($NZ)/tCO 2 e) increased by 7.5%. Overall, the results show that to increase COS, farmers should increase cattle SU. Although when considering a transition towards a higher proportion of cattle SU in the mixed system, they should also consider pasture management and environmental implications.

New Zealand Journal of Agricultural ResearchVol. 69(2)
The University of Western Australia (AU), Massey University (NZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.