Nothing About Us Without Us: Centering Lived Experience as the AMPD Moves Forward

The alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) is approaching readiness for inclusion in the main section of the DSM, yet research informing its development has largely overlooked the perspectives of those who receive personality disorder diagnoses. This commentary argues that centering lived experience is essential for evaluating the AMPD's diagnostic language, given evidence that certain trait terminology (notably "manipulativeness") is perceived as highly stigmatizing. The AMPD's Criterion A, which emphasizes personality functioning rather than dispositional traits, may offer a less stigmatizing framework-a possibility supported by emerging lived experience accounts. Building on recent work by Sharp, Cano, Masland, Navarré, and colleagues, this commentary proposes research priorities for integrating lived experience perspectives into AMPD evaluation and considers whether the ICD-11‧s sub-diagnostic "personality difficulty" category could serve both clinical and destigmatizing functions if adopted within the AMPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70072
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nothing About Us Without Us: Centering Lived Experience as the AMPD Moves Forward

Kimberly Gilbert
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Nothing About Us Without Us: Centering Lived Experience as the AMPD Moves Forward

Kimberly Gilbert
article en

Abstract

The alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) is approaching readiness for inclusion in the main section of the DSM, yet research informing its development has largely overlooked the perspectives of those who receive personality disorder diagnoses. This commentary argues that centering lived experience is essential for evaluating the AMPD's diagnostic language, given evidence that certain trait terminology (notably "manipulativeness") is perceived as highly stigmatizing. The AMPD's Criterion A, which emphasizes personality functioning rather than dispositional traits, may offer a less stigmatizing framework-a possibility supported by emerging lived experience accounts. Building on recent work by Sharp, Cano, Masland, Navarré, and colleagues, this commentary proposes research priorities for integrating lived experience perspectives into AMPD evaluation and considers whether the ICD-11‧s sub-diagnostic "personality difficulty" category could serve both clinical and destigmatizing functions if adopted within the AMPD.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 20(2)
Fordham University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nothing About Us Without Us: Centering Lived Experience as the AMPD Moves Forward — Kimberly Gilbert · Personality and Mental Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS