Optimizing Trauma Team Activation: A Mixed-Method Analysis of De-escalation, Re-consultation, and Clinician Decision-Making at a Level I Trauma Center

BackgroundTrauma team activation (TTA) optimizes trauma care but is resource-intensive. Secondary triage in-hospital with trauma team release (rTTA) improves resource allocation but may result in under-triage and adverse outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of rTTA on clinical outcomes, identify predictors of rTTA and re-consultations, and understand decision-making perspectives of trauma surgeons (TS) and emergency physicians (EPs).MethodsRetrospective analysis of TTA patients from 2023 to 2024, categorizing patients as TTA without release, rTTA without re-consultation, or Rcon (rTTA requiring subsequent re-consultation). Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated differences in clinical characteristics and predictors of Rcon. A survey on TS and EPs was administered, and responses were analyzed via descriptive statistics and thematic analysis where applicable.ResultsAmong 2091 TTA cases, 617 (29.5%) were released, with 132 patients (21.4%) requiring re-consultation. Re-consultation was most triggered by new imaging findings. Only 3 (2.3%) Rcon patients required hemorrhage control interventions. Mortality was lower among Rcon patients (3.8%) vs rTTA without re-consultation (4.5%) and TTA without release patients (10.9%). Traffic collisions, psychiatric history, and age ≥70 years were independent predictors for re-consultation (ORs = 7.05, 3.77, and 1.89, respectively). Both TS and EPs identified the same leading factors influencing rTTA, but selection frequencies differed. Qualitative thematic analysis identified key themes driving rTTA decisions, including ED evaluation findings, prehospital-emergency department discordance, and limitations of TTA criteria in special populations.DiscussionRcon occurred in one-fifth of rTTA patients, but the low mortality suggests this secondary triage may be safe in selected patients, although variability in decision-making warrants further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261437708
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Trauma Team Activation: A Mixed-Method Analysis of De-escalation, Re-consultation, and Clinician Decision-Making at a Level I Trauma Center

Joshua Bridge, Monica D. Wong, K. Inaba, Chen-Ling Tang et al.
The American Surgeon
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Optimizing Trauma Team Activation: A Mixed-Method Analysis of De-escalation, Re-consultation, and Clinician Decision-Making at a Level I Trauma Center

Joshua Bridge, Monica D. Wong, K. Inaba, Chen-Ling Tang, Elizabeth Burner, Taylor Burkholder, M. Martin, Anaar E Siletz, Justin Y Tian, Kazuhide Matsushima
article en

Abstract

BackgroundTrauma team activation (TTA) optimizes trauma care but is resource-intensive. Secondary triage in-hospital with trauma team release (rTTA) improves resource allocation but may result in under-triage and adverse outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of rTTA on clinical outcomes, identify predictors of rTTA and re-consultations, and understand decision-making perspectives of trauma surgeons (TS) and emergency physicians (EPs).MethodsRetrospective analysis of TTA patients from 2023 to 2024, categorizing patients as TTA without release, rTTA without re-consultation, or Rcon (rTTA requiring subsequent re-consultation). Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated differences in clinical characteristics and predictors of Rcon. A survey on TS and EPs was administered, and responses were analyzed via descriptive statistics and thematic analysis where applicable.ResultsAmong 2091 TTA cases, 617 (29.5%) were released, with 132 patients (21.4%) requiring re-consultation. Re-consultation was most triggered by new imaging findings. Only 3 (2.3%) Rcon patients required hemorrhage control interventions. Mortality was lower among Rcon patients (3.8%) vs rTTA without re-consultation (4.5%) and TTA without release patients (10.9%). Traffic collisions, psychiatric history, and age ≥70 years were independent predictors for re-consultation (ORs = 7.05, 3.77, and 1.89, respectively). Both TS and EPs identified the same leading factors influencing rTTA, but selection frequencies differed. Qualitative thematic analysis identified key themes driving rTTA decisions, including ED evaluation findings, prehospital-emergency department discordance, and limitations of TTA criteria in special populations.DiscussionRcon occurred in one-fifth of rTTA patients, but the low mortality suggests this secondary triage may be safe in selected patients, although variability in decision-making warrants further evaluation.

The American Surgeon
University of Southern California (US), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.