A new perspective on the CMSSM: Yukawa unification, DM and the SUSY scale

A bstract What does third family ( t - b - τ ) Yukawa unification, a typical prediction from embedding the Standard Model (SM) fermions in 16-plets of a grand unifying SO(10) gauge symmetry, imply for the scale of the supersymmetric (SUSY) partners? Which neutralino dark matter candidate can be realized, and how large is the dark matter relic density? In this work, we address these questions in a simplified SUSY-breaking framework: the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM). To this end, we recast the parameter space of the CMSSM in a way that for all parameter points the SM-like Higgs mass is correctly reproduced. Considering fixed tan β and sgn( μ ), for every point in the ( x := $$ \frac{M_{1/2}}{m_0} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> , y := $$ \frac{A_0}{m_0} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> ) parameter plane ranges for all observables are predicted. This provides a new perspective on where in parameter space different types of dark matter (DM) are realized, and which value of the SUSY scale is required in order to explain the observed mass of the SM-like Higgs boson. In our analysis we consider and compare two strategies: grid scans over the ( x , y ) and ( x , y , tan β ) parameter regions (with iterative RG evolution), as well as MCMC sampling. We find both techniques yield similar results. For t - b - τ unification within 5 % or 10 %, we find μ &lt; 0, the SUSY spectrum showing a characteristic pattern, and the SUSY scale around $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> TeV. The extra MSSM Higgses are the lowest lying new states at ~ 2 ÷ 3 TeV (with discovery potential at the HL-LHC), the $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> TeV stops and gluino are in reach of a possible FCC-hh, while bino DM has a mass above 2 . 5 TeV, is overabundant, and effectively unobservable in planned direct and indirect detection experiments. The DM relic density requires a dilution factor of 10 &lt; $$ \mathcal{D} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> </mml:math> &lt; 1000, implying non-standard cosmology that could leave its imprints in the stochastic gravitational wave background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2026)110
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new perspective on the CMSSM: Yukawa unification, DM and the SUSY scale

V. Susic, Stefan Antusch, Shaikh Saad
Journal of High Energy Physics
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

A new perspective on the CMSSM: Yukawa unification, DM and the SUSY scale

V. Susic, Stefan Antusch, Shaikh Saad
article en

Abstract

A bstract What does third family ( t - b - τ ) Yukawa unification, a typical prediction from embedding the Standard Model (SM) fermions in 16-plets of a grand unifying SO(10) gauge symmetry, imply for the scale of the supersymmetric (SUSY) partners? Which neutralino dark matter candidate can be realized, and how large is the dark matter relic density? In this work, we address these questions in a simplified SUSY-breaking framework: the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM). To this end, we recast the parameter space of the CMSSM in a way that for all parameter points the SM-like Higgs mass is correctly reproduced. Considering fixed tan β and sgn( μ ), for every point in the ( x := $$ \frac{M_{1/2}}{m_0} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> , y := $$ \frac{A_0}{m_0} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mfrac> </mml:math> ) parameter plane ranges for all observables are predicted. This provides a new perspective on where in parameter space different types of dark matter (DM) are realized, and which value of the SUSY scale is required in order to explain the observed mass of the SM-like Higgs boson. In our analysis we consider and compare two strategies: grid scans over the ( x , y ) and ( x , y , tan β ) parameter regions (with iterative RG evolution), as well as MCMC sampling. We find both techniques yield similar results. For t - b - τ unification within 5 % or 10 %, we find μ &lt; 0, the SUSY spectrum showing a characteristic pattern, and the SUSY scale around $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> TeV. The extra MSSM Higgses are the lowest lying new states at ~ 2 ÷ 3 TeV (with discovery potential at the HL-LHC), the $$ \mathcal{O}(10) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> TeV stops and gluino are in reach of a possible FCC-hh, while bino DM has a mass above 2 . 5 TeV, is overabundant, and effectively unobservable in planned direct and indirect detection experiments. The DM relic density requires a dilution factor of 10 &lt; $$ \mathcal{D} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> </mml:math> &lt; 1000, implying non-standard cosmology that could leave its imprints in the stochastic gravitational wave background.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2026(3)
University of Basel (CH), Jožef Stefan Institute (SI), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.