Analysis of Obesity Care in Spanish Healthcare Settings: OBEQUIDAD Study

ABSTRACT Background Obesity management remains influenced by misconceptions about the disease, which compromise care quality. Introduction The OBEQUIDAD study explores the clinical management of people with obesity in Spain based on the perspectives of healthcare professionals involved in its treatment across different medical specialties. Methods A cross‐sectional online survey was conducted among endocrinologists, family and community medicine specialists, and internal medicine physicians actively treating people with obesity in Spain. The survey explored patient profiles, use of clinical practice guidelines, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, motivations for initiating obesity management interventions, and follow‐up practices. Results Among 352 respondents, 37% were family and community medicine specialists, 37% were endocrinologists, and 26% were internal medicine physicians. Most worked in the public sector (87%) and in non‐obesity specific medical consultations (82%). The most common patient profile attending for obesity included women (60%), individuals aged 40–64 years (51%) and people with Class I obesity (48%) who were diagnosed opportunistically (33%) or sought treatment themselves (31%). 95% of people with obesity have obesity‐related complications: dyslipidemia (55%), hypertension (52%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (51%). Dietary and nutritional changes and increased physical activity were the most recommended obesity management interventions. The use of medical and surgical treatments was more frequent in Class II and III obesity, compared to Class I. Reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications and improving people with obesity's functional capacity and their quality of life were the main reasons to start obesity treatment. Conclusion Obesity management in Spain is mainly reactive, with care often initiated opportunistically or at the patient's request, often once comorbidities have developed. There is variability in the use of clinical practice guidelines, and treatment generally follows a stepwise approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Science & Practice
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70139
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Obesity Care in Spanish Healthcare Settings: OBEQUIDAD Study

Jennifer Redondo‐Antón, Ana de Hollanda, Maria Isabel Pérez Soto, M. Rubio-de Santos et al.
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Analysis of Obesity Care in Spanish Healthcare Settings: OBEQUIDAD Study

Jennifer Redondo‐Antón, Ana de Hollanda, Maria Isabel Pérez Soto, M. Rubio-de Santos, A. Lecube, José Manuel Fernández‐García, Javier Ágreda, Silvia Díaz‐Cerezo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Obesity management remains influenced by misconceptions about the disease, which compromise care quality. Introduction The OBEQUIDAD study explores the clinical management of people with obesity in Spain based on the perspectives of healthcare professionals involved in its treatment across different medical specialties. Methods A cross‐sectional online survey was conducted among endocrinologists, family and community medicine specialists, and internal medicine physicians actively treating people with obesity in Spain. The survey explored patient profiles, use of clinical practice guidelines, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, motivations for initiating obesity management interventions, and follow‐up practices. Results Among 352 respondents, 37% were family and community medicine specialists, 37% were endocrinologists, and 26% were internal medicine physicians. Most worked in the public sector (87%) and in non‐obesity specific medical consultations (82%). The most common patient profile attending for obesity included women (60%), individuals aged 40–64 years (51%) and people with Class I obesity (48%) who were diagnosed opportunistically (33%) or sought treatment themselves (31%). 95% of people with obesity have obesity‐related complications: dyslipidemia (55%), hypertension (52%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (51%). Dietary and nutritional changes and increased physical activity were the most recommended obesity management interventions. The use of medical and surgical treatments was more frequent in Class II and III obesity, compared to Class I. Reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications and improving people with obesity's functional capacity and their quality of life were the main reasons to start obesity treatment. Conclusion Obesity management in Spain is mainly reactive, with care often initiated opportunistically or at the patient's request, often once comorbidities have developed. There is variability in the use of clinical practice guidelines, and treatment generally follows a stepwise approach.

Obesity Science & PracticeVol. 12(2)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (ES), Eli Lilly (Spain) (ES), Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.