Optimizing planting geometry in sorghum–soybean systems: asymmetric row spacing improves resource use efficiency and crop adaptation in semi-arid environments

This study (2023–2024) assessed soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivated as a monocrop or intercropped with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) adopting three planting configurations: alternate-row intercropping (App1), asymmetric-row intercropping (App2), and soybean monoculture (App3). Morphological, physiological, yield, and seed oil-quality parameters were assessed using multivariate analyses and multi-criteria decision-making methods. In the two years studied, App 3 tended to achieve the greatest shoot and root biomass, pod production, and cumulative oil content, emphasizing its excellence in overall productivity. App 1 showed low reproductive output, declining from 68.00 to 47.83 pods plant⁻¹, with pod weight increasing only from 21.29 to 32.00 g across years. However, intercropped soybean recovered in the second year: shoot weight increased from 8.16 to 66.47 g in App 1 and from 14.89 to 58.92 g in App 2. Root fresh weight also improved markedly, especially in App 2 (4.14 to 19.33 g), indicating stronger below-ground resource capture in 2024. Oil composition shifted toward higher oleic acid under intercropping, with App 1 increasing from 21.73% (2023) to 28.84% (2024). Nonetheless, Asymmetric intercropping (App 2) shown enhancement in the second year, especially in photosynthetic efficiency and oil quality (increased oleic acid content). In contrast, alternate-row intercropping (App 1) typically diminished output due to intensified competition, although there was some rebound in aboveground biomass in the second year. The overall performance was evaluated using WSM, AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS, with all methodologies designating 2024-App3 as the superior option, followed by 2023-App 3 and 2024-App 2. While monocropping exhibited greater performance overall, the positive trajectory of asymmetric intercropping suggests its potential as a viable option in semi-arid environments when row spacing is appropriately adjusted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Plant Biology
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-08626-3
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing planting geometry in sorghum–soybean systems: asymmetric row spacing improves resource use efficiency and crop adaptation in semi-arid environments

Mojtaba Kordrostami, Birgül Güden, Moin Qureshi, Muharrem Gölükçü et al.
BMC Plant Biology
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Optimizing planting geometry in sorghum–soybean systems: asymmetric row spacing improves resource use efficiency and crop adaptation in semi-arid environments

Mojtaba Kordrostami, Birgül Güden, Moin Qureshi, Muharrem Gölükçü, Bülent Uzun, Engin Yol
article en

Abstract

This study (2023–2024) assessed soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivated as a monocrop or intercropped with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) adopting three planting configurations: alternate-row intercropping (App1), asymmetric-row intercropping (App2), and soybean monoculture (App3). Morphological, physiological, yield, and seed oil-quality parameters were assessed using multivariate analyses and multi-criteria decision-making methods. In the two years studied, App 3 tended to achieve the greatest shoot and root biomass, pod production, and cumulative oil content, emphasizing its excellence in overall productivity. App 1 showed low reproductive output, declining from 68.00 to 47.83 pods plant⁻¹, with pod weight increasing only from 21.29 to 32.00 g across years. However, intercropped soybean recovered in the second year: shoot weight increased from 8.16 to 66.47 g in App 1 and from 14.89 to 58.92 g in App 2. Root fresh weight also improved markedly, especially in App 2 (4.14 to 19.33 g), indicating stronger below-ground resource capture in 2024. Oil composition shifted toward higher oleic acid under intercropping, with App 1 increasing from 21.73% (2023) to 28.84% (2024). Nonetheless, Asymmetric intercropping (App 2) shown enhancement in the second year, especially in photosynthetic efficiency and oil quality (increased oleic acid content). In contrast, alternate-row intercropping (App 1) typically diminished output due to intensified competition, although there was some rebound in aboveground biomass in the second year. The overall performance was evaluated using WSM, AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS, with all methodologies designating 2024-App3 as the superior option, followed by 2023-App 3 and 2024-App 2. While monocropping exhibited greater performance overall, the positive trajectory of asymmetric intercropping suggests its potential as a viable option in semi-arid environments when row spacing is appropriately adjusted.

BMC Plant Biology
Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (IR), Akdeniz University (TR), Mediterranean University (ME), Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.