Multi-Omics Integration in Urological Cancers: Unlocking Precision Diagnosis and Therapy Through Big Data

<span>Background: Urological cancers, such as prostate, bladder and renal cell carcinoma, contribute substantially to the global cancer burden. Their management remains challenging due to extensive molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Conventional single-omics approaches (e.g., genomics and transcriptomics) have led to important discoveries but provided only partial views of tumour biology, which limit the robustness of biomarkers and therapeutic precision. Multi-omics integration offers a systems-level perspective that captures the complex regulatory networks underlying tumour initiation, progression and treatment resistance.</span> <div style="text-align:justify;"> Methods: We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of recent literature on multi-omics integration in urological cancers. Sources included PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, and only English-language peer-reviewed studies published before September 2025. We synthesised findings from studies employing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and epigenomics, alongside computational integration frameworks, such as machine learning, graph neural networks, stemnessbased classifiers and spatial multi-omics. </div> <div style="text-align:justify;"> Results: Multi-omics integration enables the refinement of molecular subtypes, identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers and discovery of therapeutic targets across prostate, bladder and renal cancers. Examples include stemness-based classifiers in prostate cancer that stratify patients by prognosis and therapy sensitivity, consensus molecular subtypes of bladder cancer with differential therapeutic vulnerabilities and programmed cell death-based signatures in renal cancer linked to </div> <div style="text-align:justify;"> prognosis and immune responses. However, key challenges persist, including data heterogeneity, limited cohort sizes, lack of standardised analytical pipelines and translational gaps between discovery and clinical implementation. </div> <p style="text-align:justify;"> Conclusions: Multi-omics integration is rapidly evolving from an exploratory research tool into a cornerstone of precision urology. Through mechanistically grounded, clinically interpretable models of disease, multi-omics holds the potential to improve individualised diagnosis, prognostication and therapy selection. Translation of multi-omics into routine clinical practice will hinge on overcoming current limitations through standardisation, collaborative consortia and explainable artificial intelligence. <div style="text-align:justify;"> </div>

Publication Details

Journal
Archivos Españoles de Urología
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267902.21
Primary Topic
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Omics Integration in Urological Cancers: Unlocking Precision Diagnosis and Therapy Through Big Data

Archivos Españoles de Urología
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
article

Multi-Omics Integration in Urological Cancers: Unlocking Precision Diagnosis and Therapy Through Big Data

article en

Abstract

<span>Background: Urological cancers, such as prostate, bladder and renal cell carcinoma, contribute substantially to the global cancer burden. Their management remains challenging due to extensive molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Conventional single-omics approaches (e.g., genomics and transcriptomics) have led to important discoveries but provided only partial views of tumour biology, which limit the robustness of biomarkers and therapeutic precision. Multi-omics integration offers a systems-level perspective that captures the complex regulatory networks underlying tumour initiation, progression and treatment resistance.</span> <div style="text-align:justify;"> Methods: We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of recent literature on multi-omics integration in urological cancers. Sources included PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, and only English-language peer-reviewed studies published before September 2025. We synthesised findings from studies employing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and epigenomics, alongside computational integration frameworks, such as machine learning, graph neural networks, stemnessbased classifiers and spatial multi-omics. </div> <div style="text-align:justify;"> Results: Multi-omics integration enables the refinement of molecular subtypes, identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers and discovery of therapeutic targets across prostate, bladder and renal cancers. Examples include stemness-based classifiers in prostate cancer that stratify patients by prognosis and therapy sensitivity, consensus molecular subtypes of bladder cancer with differential therapeutic vulnerabilities and programmed cell death-based signatures in renal cancer linked to </div> <div style="text-align:justify;"> prognosis and immune responses. However, key challenges persist, including data heterogeneity, limited cohort sizes, lack of standardised analytical pipelines and translational gaps between discovery and clinical implementation. </div> <p style="text-align:justify;"> Conclusions: Multi-omics integration is rapidly evolving from an exploratory research tool into a cornerstone of precision urology. Through mechanistically grounded, clinically interpretable models of disease, multi-omics holds the potential to improve individualised diagnosis, prognostication and therapy selection. Translation of multi-omics into routine clinical practice will hinge on overcoming current limitations through standardisation, collaborative consortia and explainable artificial intelligence. <div style="text-align:justify;"> </div>

Archivos Españoles de UrologíaVol. 79(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.