How the United Nations targets human rights public diplomacy

Abstract International organizations employ public diplomacy like states, yet we know little about how they strategically allocate diplomatic resources. We examine determinants of high-level visits by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to understand how this body balances principled goals with strategic constraints. We theorize that visits serve dual functions: signaling international scrutiny to repressive regimes while cultivating soft power where conditions favor human rights progress. Using original data on OHCHR delegation travel (1998-2019), we show that OHCHR visits target highly repressive states but are significantly more likely in places with a greater peacekeeping presence and democratization episodes, which we argue provide reach and create receptive local audiences, respectively. These findings suggest that OHCHR visits are jointly motivated by need and domestic political opportunities for influence. By demonstrating this international organization’s strategic use of visit diplomacy, we shed light on an understudied mechanism for advancing human rights norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of International Organizations
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-026-09617-7
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the United Nations targets human rights public diplomacy

Sam R. Bell, Risa Kitagawa
The Review of International Organizations
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

How the United Nations targets human rights public diplomacy

Sam R. Bell, Risa Kitagawa
article en

Abstract

Abstract International organizations employ public diplomacy like states, yet we know little about how they strategically allocate diplomatic resources. We examine determinants of high-level visits by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to understand how this body balances principled goals with strategic constraints. We theorize that visits serve dual functions: signaling international scrutiny to repressive regimes while cultivating soft power where conditions favor human rights progress. Using original data on OHCHR delegation travel (1998-2019), we show that OHCHR visits target highly repressive states but are significantly more likely in places with a greater peacekeeping presence and democratization episodes, which we argue provide reach and create receptive local audiences, respectively. These findings suggest that OHCHR visits are jointly motivated by need and domestic political opportunities for influence. By demonstrating this international organization’s strategic use of visit diplomacy, we shed light on an understudied mechanism for advancing human rights norms.

The Review of International Organizations
Northeastern University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.