Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk

People constantly invest effort to seek information in everyday life, even if the information is of no instrumental value for the decision at hand. However, the mechanism underlying people’s willingness to exert effort in exchange for information remains unclear. Previous work has suggested that desirability and uncertainty are two key factors influencing information-seeking, but few studies have tested if these factors are important when exerting physical effort in exchange for information. Additionally, it remains unknown whether different kinds of uncertainty, i.e., risk and ambiguity, have differential impacts. In the current study, we developed a novel information-seeking task to quantify the value of non-instrumental information using incentive-compatible physical effort to examine how effort changes as a function of desirability and uncertainty. Across two studies (N = 123), we found that people’s willingness to exert effort is positively associated with outcome expected value under both risk and ambiguity. Additionally, people exert more effort when outcome distribution uncertainty increases in risky situations, but are insensitive to ambiguity, except when facing extreme ambiguity. Our results demonstrate an unexpected dissociation. Humans will engage in effort-based information-seeking, even for non-instrumental information, when facing risk. In contrast, they show a much lower willingness to expend effort to resolve non-instrumental ambiguity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43803-2
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk

Elizabeth A. Phelps, Hayley M. Dorfman, Haoxue Fan, Paul W. Glimcher et al.
Scientific Reports
Game Theory and Applications
article

Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk

Elizabeth A. Phelps, Hayley M. Dorfman, Haoxue Fan, Paul W. Glimcher, Dorothy Grace Benkelman, Bryan J. W. Dong, Alexandra M. Rodman
article en

Abstract

People constantly invest effort to seek information in everyday life, even if the information is of no instrumental value for the decision at hand. However, the mechanism underlying people’s willingness to exert effort in exchange for information remains unclear. Previous work has suggested that desirability and uncertainty are two key factors influencing information-seeking, but few studies have tested if these factors are important when exerting physical effort in exchange for information. Additionally, it remains unknown whether different kinds of uncertainty, i.e., risk and ambiguity, have differential impacts. In the current study, we developed a novel information-seeking task to quantify the value of non-instrumental information using incentive-compatible physical effort to examine how effort changes as a function of desirability and uncertainty. Across two studies (N = 123), we found that people’s willingness to exert effort is positively associated with outcome expected value under both risk and ambiguity. Additionally, people exert more effort when outcome distribution uncertainty increases in risky situations, but are insensitive to ambiguity, except when facing extreme ambiguity. Our results demonstrate an unexpected dissociation. Humans will engage in effort-based information-seeking, even for non-instrumental information, when facing risk. In contrast, they show a much lower willingness to expend effort to resolve non-instrumental ambiguity.

Scientific Reports
Northeastern University (US), Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk — Elizabeth A. Phelps, Hayley M. Dorfman, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS