Development and validation of an online prognostic risk stratification tool to assist decisions on perioperative chemotherapy for men with luminal early breast cancer

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, and indications for chemotherapy (ChT) in luminal early MBC remain understudied. We aimed to develop a model to predict outcomes for these patients and identify candidates for ChT omission. Luminal early MBC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (diagnosed in 2010–2018, N = 2845) and a Chinese cohort (diagnosed in 2000–2020, N = 586) were included. SEER-derived patients (diagnosed in 2010–2016) were split into training (N = 1405) and test (N = 758) sets in a 65:35 ratio; others (diagnosed in 2017–2018) formed the US validation set (N = 682). Chinese patients constituted the CHN validation set. The response variable and primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Four machine learning models and a Cox-based nomogram were evaluated. Low- and high-risk groups were stratified utilizing the 5-year risk scores predicted by the optimal model. Survival analysis employed Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Patients in two risk groups exhibited significantly different OS across all datasets (all P < 0.001). ChT conferred no OS benefit in low-risk patients [ChT-free as reference: training set, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 1.60, P = 0.249; test set, HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.76, P = 0.375; US validation set, HR = 1.47, 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.94, P = 0.276; CHN validation set, HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.99, P = 0.891. Multivariable: comparable results]. For high-risk patients, ChT was significantly associated with superior OS [ChT-free as reference: training set, HR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74, P < 0.001; test set, HR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.94, P = 0.019; US validation set, HR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84, P = 0.007; CHN validation set, HR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.93, P = 0.027. Multivariable: comparable results]. The web-based tool has been deployed. Our model accurately predicts and stratifies OS in American and Chinese male patients with luminal early breast cancer. This risk stratification may aid in identifying low-risk candidates to omit ChT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-026-02252-5
Primary Topic
Male Breast Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an online prognostic risk stratification tool to assist decisions on perioperative chemotherapy for men with luminal early breast cancer

W Chen, Jianyun Nie, Yuxuan Gao, Marshall Xu et al.
Breast Cancer Research
Male Breast Health Studies
article

Development and validation of an online prognostic risk stratification tool to assist decisions on perioperative chemotherapy for men with luminal early breast cancer

W Chen, Jianyun Nie, Yuxuan Gao, Marshall Xu, Zefei Jiang, G. Sun, M. Zhang, Y. Lin, G. Ye, Li Ma
article en

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, and indications for chemotherapy (ChT) in luminal early MBC remain understudied. We aimed to develop a model to predict outcomes for these patients and identify candidates for ChT omission. Luminal early MBC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (diagnosed in 2010–2018, N = 2845) and a Chinese cohort (diagnosed in 2000–2020, N = 586) were included. SEER-derived patients (diagnosed in 2010–2016) were split into training (N = 1405) and test (N = 758) sets in a 65:35 ratio; others (diagnosed in 2017–2018) formed the US validation set (N = 682). Chinese patients constituted the CHN validation set. The response variable and primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Four machine learning models and a Cox-based nomogram were evaluated. Low- and high-risk groups were stratified utilizing the 5-year risk scores predicted by the optimal model. Survival analysis employed Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Patients in two risk groups exhibited significantly different OS across all datasets (all P < 0.001). ChT conferred no OS benefit in low-risk patients [ChT-free as reference: training set, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 1.60, P = 0.249; test set, HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.76, P = 0.375; US validation set, HR = 1.47, 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.94, P = 0.276; CHN validation set, HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.99, P = 0.891. Multivariable: comparable results]. For high-risk patients, ChT was significantly associated with superior OS [ChT-free as reference: training set, HR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74, P < 0.001; test set, HR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.94, P = 0.019; US validation set, HR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84, P = 0.007; CHN validation set, HR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.93, P = 0.027. Multivariable: comparable results]. The web-based tool has been deployed. Our model accurately predicts and stratifies OS in American and Chinese male patients with luminal early breast cancer. This risk stratification may aid in identifying low-risk candidates to omit ChT.

Breast Cancer Research
Hebei Medical University (CN), Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Kunming Medical University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), First People's Hospital of Foshan (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Male Breast Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.