Comparative Surgical Outcomes in Ballistic Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Single-Surgeon Experience and Mechanism-Based Classification of Gunshot versus Shrapnel Trauma

Ballistic peripheral nerve injuries are increasingly encountered in both military and civilian practice. Injuries caused by high-velocity bullets and by shrapnel differ significantly in mechanism, pathological characteristics, and clinical behavior. To compare bullet-related and shrapnel-related peripheral nerve injuries with respect to injury mechanisms, intraneural foreign bodies, neuropathic pain, motor deficit severity, surgical strategy, timing of intervention, and outcomes, and to define optimal microsurgical management principles. A structured review was conducted on 107 patients, including cases previously published by Rochkind et al. (2000, 2002, 2007, 2014) and additional recent clinical experience. Analysis focused on injury morphology, indications for neurolysis versus nerve grafting, timing of surgery, and prognostic factors. Only limb peripheral nerve injuries were included; brachial plexus injuries were excluded. Shrapnel injuries demonstrated higher rates of intraneural foreign bodies (≈55%) and severe neuropathic pain (≈95%) than bullet injuries (≈4–5% and ≈73%). Severe motor deficits (MRC <3) were more common in bullet injuries (≈90%) than in shrapnel injuries (≈62%). Pain improvement was greater after bullet injuries, whereas nerve grafting provided superior pain relief in shrapnel injuries. Early surgery (<3 months) significantly improved pain outcomes in shrapnel injuries. Bullet injuries are typically focal and static, whereas shrapnel injuries are diffuse and progressive. Early microsurgical exploration with foreign-body removal and selective nerve grafting is recommended for shrapnel injuries, while bullet injuries benefit from continuity-based reconstruction strategies. • Gunshot and shrapnel peripheral nerve injuries represent distinct biological entities • Shrapnel injuries are progressive and frequently associated with intraneural foreign bodies • Neuropathic pain is more severe and more refractory in shrapnel-related nerve injuries • Early microsurgical intervention (<3 months) improves pain outcomes in shrapnel trauma • Nerve grafting is more effective than neurolysis alone for pain control in shrapnel injuries

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain and Spine
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2026.106025
Primary Topic
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Surgical Outcomes in Ballistic Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Single-Surgeon Experience and Mechanism-Based Classification of Gunshot versus Shrapnel Trauma

Shimon Rochkind
Brain and Spine
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
article

Comparative Surgical Outcomes in Ballistic Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Single-Surgeon Experience and Mechanism-Based Classification of Gunshot versus Shrapnel Trauma

Shimon Rochkind
article en

Abstract

Ballistic peripheral nerve injuries are increasingly encountered in both military and civilian practice. Injuries caused by high-velocity bullets and by shrapnel differ significantly in mechanism, pathological characteristics, and clinical behavior. To compare bullet-related and shrapnel-related peripheral nerve injuries with respect to injury mechanisms, intraneural foreign bodies, neuropathic pain, motor deficit severity, surgical strategy, timing of intervention, and outcomes, and to define optimal microsurgical management principles. A structured review was conducted on 107 patients, including cases previously published by Rochkind et al. (2000, 2002, 2007, 2014) and additional recent clinical experience. Analysis focused on injury morphology, indications for neurolysis versus nerve grafting, timing of surgery, and prognostic factors. Only limb peripheral nerve injuries were included; brachial plexus injuries were excluded. Shrapnel injuries demonstrated higher rates of intraneural foreign bodies (≈55%) and severe neuropathic pain (≈95%) than bullet injuries (≈4–5% and ≈73%). Severe motor deficits (MRC <3) were more common in bullet injuries (≈90%) than in shrapnel injuries (≈62%). Pain improvement was greater after bullet injuries, whereas nerve grafting provided superior pain relief in shrapnel injuries. Early surgery (<3 months) significantly improved pain outcomes in shrapnel injuries. Bullet injuries are typically focal and static, whereas shrapnel injuries are diffuse and progressive. Early microsurgical exploration with foreign-body removal and selective nerve grafting is recommended for shrapnel injuries, while bullet injuries benefit from continuity-based reconstruction strategies. • Gunshot and shrapnel peripheral nerve injuries represent distinct biological entities • Shrapnel injuries are progressive and frequently associated with intraneural foreign bodies • Neuropathic pain is more severe and more refractory in shrapnel-related nerve injuries • Early microsurgical intervention (<3 months) improves pain outcomes in shrapnel trauma • Nerve grafting is more effective than neurolysis alone for pain control in shrapnel injuries

Brain and Spine
Tel Aviv University (IL), Assuta Medical Center (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.