Taxonomic and functional diversity of urban bees of the world

Bees play a pivotal role in terrestrial environments. Urbanization can affect these organisms and the ecosystem services they provide. However, knowledge of the global diversity of urban bees is limited. Thus, we summarized data on urban bee species identities and occurrences; compared distributions of all bees with those found in urban environments; described traits and resource collection across latitudinal regions; and determined species' conservation status. We identified 1981 urban bee species, representing 9.5% of overall diversity. Nontropical regions had more studies and higher bee richness than tropical regions, indicating geographical bias. Family distributions of urban bees were similar to those observed for overall bee diversity. The Apidae family accounted for 35.1% of urban species worldwide. In the tropics, Apidae accounted for 69.0%. Most urban bees of the world were solitary (49.8%) and social (33.8%) (eusocial, 4.7%; kleptoparasite, 11%), were medium (41.8%) to small sized (36.2%), nested in soil rather than cavities (65.0%), and had the capacity to perform buzz pollination (65.0%). Only a small proportion of bees collected specialized resources (oil, 3.2%; resin, 12.1%; fragrance, 2.9%) and plant material (10.7%). Due to the dominance of Apidae, this situation differed in the tropics, where there was a higher degree of social (42.9%) and eusocial habits (20.1%), more large-sized species (42.9%), more cavity-nesting species (62.7%), and especially a higher representation of specialized resource collection, including oil (10.7%), resin (44.2%), and fragrance (17.6%). Most species (96.4%) had not had their conservation status evaluated. Our results showed that urban environments worldwide can support a high taxonomic and functional diversity of bees, but that this capacity differed across latitudes. Our findings can be used to inform management strategies that promote suitable nesting sites and provide specific resources for bees in each global region, making cities more bee friendly and maintaining the ecosystem services bees provide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70259
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxonomic and functional diversity of urban bees of the world

Renata Trevizan, Lorena B. Valadão‐Mendes, Ivair Gomes, JS Borges et al.
Conservation Biology
Plant and animal studies
article

Taxonomic and functional diversity of urban bees of the world

Renata Trevizan, Lorena B. Valadão‐Mendes, Ivair Gomes, JS Borges, João Luís Cardoso, Larissa Lorraine, Rogério V. Gonçalves, Victor H. D. Silva, Léo C. Rocha‐Filho, Yasmine Antonini, Pietro K. Maruyama
article en

Abstract

Bees play a pivotal role in terrestrial environments. Urbanization can affect these organisms and the ecosystem services they provide. However, knowledge of the global diversity of urban bees is limited. Thus, we summarized data on urban bee species identities and occurrences; compared distributions of all bees with those found in urban environments; described traits and resource collection across latitudinal regions; and determined species' conservation status. We identified 1981 urban bee species, representing 9.5% of overall diversity. Nontropical regions had more studies and higher bee richness than tropical regions, indicating geographical bias. Family distributions of urban bees were similar to those observed for overall bee diversity. The Apidae family accounted for 35.1% of urban species worldwide. In the tropics, Apidae accounted for 69.0%. Most urban bees of the world were solitary (49.8%) and social (33.8%) (eusocial, 4.7%; kleptoparasite, 11%), were medium (41.8%) to small sized (36.2%), nested in soil rather than cavities (65.0%), and had the capacity to perform buzz pollination (65.0%). Only a small proportion of bees collected specialized resources (oil, 3.2%; resin, 12.1%; fragrance, 2.9%) and plant material (10.7%). Due to the dominance of Apidae, this situation differed in the tropics, where there was a higher degree of social (42.9%) and eusocial habits (20.1%), more large-sized species (42.9%), more cavity-nesting species (62.7%), and especially a higher representation of specialized resource collection, including oil (10.7%), resin (44.2%), and fragrance (17.6%). Most species (96.4%) had not had their conservation status evaluated. Our results showed that urban environments worldwide can support a high taxonomic and functional diversity of bees, but that this capacity differed across latitudes. Our findings can be used to inform management strategies that promote suitable nesting sites and provide specific resources for bees in each global region, making cities more bee friendly and maintaining the ecosystem services bees provide.

Conservation Biology
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of Wollongong (AU), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Instituto Florestal (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.