Systemic Opacity Risk: Macroprudential Dimension of AI Governance in Banking [V.02]

Abstract— The integration of artificial intelligence into banking has intensified reliance on decision systems whose internal logic may not be fully reconstructible. Existing analyses have addressed opacity primarily at the institutional level, focusing on governance, explainability, and model oversight. This paper introduces Systemic Opacity Risk (SOR) as a macroprudential dimension of AI-driven finance. SOR is defined as the risk that the aggregation and correlation of institutional opacity—even where individually contained within tolerance thresholds—may impair the financial system’s collective capacity to reconstruct decisions under systemic stress. The framework remains conceptual. It does not propose quantification or immediate regulatory intervention. Its contribution lies in identifying a dimension of systemic vulnerability linked not to the propagation of financial losses, but to the preservation of system-level intelligibility under stress. [This expanded version develops the structural and macroprudential dimensions of Systemic Opacity Risk introduced in the earlier conceptual paper circulated in March 2026; it builds and extends the author’s prior research on AI explainability, prudential architecture, and tolerance for opacity]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19148607
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic Opacity Risk: Macroprudential Dimension of AI Governance in Banking [V.02]

JM García-Maceiras
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Systemic Opacity Risk: Macroprudential Dimension of AI Governance in Banking [V.02]

JM García-Maceiras
article en

Abstract

Abstract— The integration of artificial intelligence into banking has intensified reliance on decision systems whose internal logic may not be fully reconstructible. Existing analyses have addressed opacity primarily at the institutional level, focusing on governance, explainability, and model oversight. This paper introduces Systemic Opacity Risk (SOR) as a macroprudential dimension of AI-driven finance. SOR is defined as the risk that the aggregation and correlation of institutional opacity—even where individually contained within tolerance thresholds—may impair the financial system’s collective capacity to reconstruct decisions under systemic stress. The framework remains conceptual. It does not propose quantification or immediate regulatory intervention. Its contribution lies in identifying a dimension of systemic vulnerability linked not to the propagation of financial losses, but to the preservation of system-level intelligibility under stress. [This expanded version develops the structural and macroprudential dimensions of Systemic Opacity Risk introduced in the earlier conceptual paper circulated in March 2026; it builds and extends the author’s prior research on AI explainability, prudential architecture, and tolerance for opacity]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.