Evaluating the Use of Google Street View to Visually Verify the Locations of Cannabis Retailers in the United States Extracted from Websites, 2015–2018

Our ability to advance public health and policy responses to cannabis legalization is limited by a lack of geographic data on cannabis retailers across states and over time. This study evaluated the feasibility and utility of using Google Street View (GSV) to: 1) visually verify cannabis retailers locations extracted from websites and (2) create a historical retailer list. We extracted and deduplicated cannabis retailer addresses from 6 websites advertising medical and adult use cannabis retailers across 13 US states in February 2019. We visually verified the locations of cannabis retailers in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, summarizing results by state and year. We assessed proportions of verified retailers within and across the legislative period in which states first legalized medical cannabis (ballot [1996–1999], early [2000–2008], late [2009–2018]) using a Chi-square test. Of 1,739 retailers, 74% were visually verified at least one year between 2015 and 2018. Verification was ≥ 74% in all but California and Florida in 2018. Visual verification prior to 2017 was low, largely due to missing GSV images. Proportions of visually verified retailers varied between states legalizing medical cannabis in the ballot (p < 0.001), but not in the early (p = 0.236) and late legislative periods (p = 0.585). GSV virtual audit methods may be appropriate for visually verifying cannabis retailers contemporaneously, but are not appropriate for reconstructing historic retailer lists. Some states (e.g., California) may require the use of additional verification methods. Future studies should assess the feasibility of using GSV in conjunction with novel methods for processing data (e.g., machine learning).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-026-09823-1
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Use of Google Street View to Visually Verify the Locations of Cannabis Retailers in the United States Extracted from Websites, 2015–2018

Andrew Edmonds, Magdalena Pankowska, Matthew Mahlan, Kyle Nameth et al.
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Evaluating the Use of Google Street View to Visually Verify the Locations of Cannabis Retailers in the United States Extracted from Websites, 2015–2018

Andrew Edmonds, Magdalena Pankowska, Matthew Mahlan, Kyle Nameth, Hannah Cooper, Yen-Tyng Chen, Danielle Haley, Michael Williams
article en

Abstract

Our ability to advance public health and policy responses to cannabis legalization is limited by a lack of geographic data on cannabis retailers across states and over time. This study evaluated the feasibility and utility of using Google Street View (GSV) to: 1) visually verify cannabis retailers locations extracted from websites and (2) create a historical retailer list. We extracted and deduplicated cannabis retailer addresses from 6 websites advertising medical and adult use cannabis retailers across 13 US states in February 2019. We visually verified the locations of cannabis retailers in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, summarizing results by state and year. We assessed proportions of verified retailers within and across the legislative period in which states first legalized medical cannabis (ballot [1996–1999], early [2000–2008], late [2009–2018]) using a Chi-square test. Of 1,739 retailers, 74% were visually verified at least one year between 2015 and 2018. Verification was ≥ 74% in all but California and Florida in 2018. Visual verification prior to 2017 was low, largely due to missing GSV images. Proportions of visually verified retailers varied between states legalizing medical cannabis in the ballot (p < 0.001), but not in the early (p = 0.236) and late legislative periods (p = 0.585). GSV virtual audit methods may be appropriate for visually verifying cannabis retailers contemporaneously, but are not appropriate for reconstructing historic retailer lists. Some states (e.g., California) may require the use of additional verification methods. Future studies should assess the feasibility of using GSV in conjunction with novel methods for processing data (e.g., machine learning).

Applied Spatial Analysis and PolicyVol. 19(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Northeastern University (US), Emory University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.