Long-term seclusion in forensic psychiatry: Bare life, social death, and the role of the nurse

BackgroundThe use of seclusion and other restraints in forensic mental health settings are intended to be employed as a last resort and for the shortest time possible to achieve therapeutic effect. And yet, in Canadian forensic hospital settings, patients can remain in seclusion for weeks, months, even years. An ambiguous legal framework across Canadian provinces lacks mechanisms to limit or forbid the long-term seclusion of patients, which we define as any continuous confinement lasting 15 days or longer.Research objectivesThe paper undertakes a critical examination of long-term seclusion practices in forensic hospitals, based on the results of a qualitative study examining nursing practices with 'difficult' patients. Agamben's concepts of homo sacer and bare life and Guenther's concept of social death provide the framework for this critical examination.Research designA qualitative research design was employed, utilizing a critical discourse analysis methodology.Participants and context7 nurses working in a high security forensic hospital setting in Canada participated in qualitative interviews.Ethical considerationsThe paradox of custody and caring is central to the considerable ethical challenges nurses face with patients in long-term seclusion.Findings/resultsIntegration of study findings with existing (limited) studies of this phenomenon illustrate that, though rare, patients in forensic hospital settings may be subject to lengthy and legally ambiguous periods of seclusion. Nursing practices and interventions are aimed at providing patients temporary reprieve from a state of bare life and to alleviate their social death. However, no mechanisms exist to prevent the use of long-term seclusion.ConclusionsLong-term seclusion represents a regrettable practice in forensic hospital settings aimed at the management of 'difficult' patients but is devoid of therapeutic value or intent. Existing nursing practices can only temporarily relieve patients from this state. More substantive and lasting solutions are proposed, focusing on the role of the nurse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261437263
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term seclusion in forensic psychiatry: Bare life, social death, and the role of the nurse

Jim A. Johansson, Cindy Peternelj-Taylor, Maya Szczepek
Nursing Ethics
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Long-term seclusion in forensic psychiatry: Bare life, social death, and the role of the nurse

Jim A. Johansson, Cindy Peternelj-Taylor, Maya Szczepek
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of seclusion and other restraints in forensic mental health settings are intended to be employed as a last resort and for the shortest time possible to achieve therapeutic effect. And yet, in Canadian forensic hospital settings, patients can remain in seclusion for weeks, months, even years. An ambiguous legal framework across Canadian provinces lacks mechanisms to limit or forbid the long-term seclusion of patients, which we define as any continuous confinement lasting 15 days or longer.Research objectivesThe paper undertakes a critical examination of long-term seclusion practices in forensic hospitals, based on the results of a qualitative study examining nursing practices with 'difficult' patients. Agamben's concepts of homo sacer and bare life and Guenther's concept of social death provide the framework for this critical examination.Research designA qualitative research design was employed, utilizing a critical discourse analysis methodology.Participants and context7 nurses working in a high security forensic hospital setting in Canada participated in qualitative interviews.Ethical considerationsThe paradox of custody and caring is central to the considerable ethical challenges nurses face with patients in long-term seclusion.Findings/resultsIntegration of study findings with existing (limited) studies of this phenomenon illustrate that, though rare, patients in forensic hospital settings may be subject to lengthy and legally ambiguous periods of seclusion. Nursing practices and interventions are aimed at providing patients temporary reprieve from a state of bare life and to alleviate their social death. However, no mechanisms exist to prevent the use of long-term seclusion.ConclusionsLong-term seclusion represents a regrettable practice in forensic hospital settings aimed at the management of 'difficult' patients but is devoid of therapeutic value or intent. Existing nursing practices can only temporarily relieve patients from this state. More substantive and lasting solutions are proposed, focusing on the role of the nurse.

Nursing Ethics
University of Alberta (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.