Beyond the Screen: Assessing the Interdisciplinary Value of Film Analysis for Undergraduate Students

This study critically examines the impact of a “Films and Society” course in a multidisciplinary Indian university, addressing the gap in empirical evaluation of film-based pedagogy. Using survey data from 554 undergraduates and exploratory factor analysis, five dimensions of engagement were identified. Regression revealed that Academic & Skill Relevance was the strongest predictor of perceived learning (β > .64, p < .001), with societal/aesthetic and cognitive realism dimensions also positively associated, though socio-emotional and logical–technical orientations had mixed or modest effects. While the findings align with the NEP 2020 goals for holistic education, the limitations of the qualitative approach, representativeness and cross-sectional design constrain the conclusions. These results invite further exploration of film pedagogy across institutional contexts and encourage the consideration of non-cognitive outcomes and long-term impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Educator
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958261425541
Primary Topic
Film in Education and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Screen: Assessing the Interdisciplinary Value of Film Analysis for Undergraduate Students

Niharika Bhowmik, Sandesh Mahajan
Journalism & Mass Communication Educator
Film in Education and Therapy
article

Beyond the Screen: Assessing the Interdisciplinary Value of Film Analysis for Undergraduate Students

Niharika Bhowmik, Sandesh Mahajan
article en

Abstract

This study critically examines the impact of a “Films and Society” course in a multidisciplinary Indian university, addressing the gap in empirical evaluation of film-based pedagogy. Using survey data from 554 undergraduates and exploratory factor analysis, five dimensions of engagement were identified. Regression revealed that Academic & Skill Relevance was the strongest predictor of perceived learning (β > .64, p < .001), with societal/aesthetic and cognitive realism dimensions also positively associated, though socio-emotional and logical–technical orientations had mixed or modest effects. While the findings align with the NEP 2020 goals for holistic education, the limitations of the qualitative approach, representativeness and cross-sectional design constrain the conclusions. These results invite further exploration of film pedagogy across institutional contexts and encourage the consideration of non-cognitive outcomes and long-term impacts.

Journalism & Mass Communication Educator
Pandit Deendayal Energy University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Film in Education and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.