Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing

The purpose of this study was to perform biomechanical pull-out comparisons between composite bone blocks and additively manufactured bone models using locked plate and screw systems. The hypothesis posited that the mean pull-out force of the 3D-printed models would demonstrate non-inferior pull-out strength compared to standard composite bones within a clinically acceptable 15% margin. A standardized pull-out mechanism was developed to evaluate its biomechanical reliability and its potential as a customizable alternative. The study compared three groups: standard composite (Sawbones) blocks and two types of additively manufactured polylactic acid (PLA) blocks (grid and gyroid infill pattern), each measuring the same dimensions with 30% infill and mimicking a Sawbones block with 2 mm cortical thickness. A 6-hole LC-DCP titanium plate was fixed onto bone block models with dimensions of 29 × 170 × 42 mm using four screws, each measuring 36 mm in length, which were inserted perpendicularly and tightened to the same torque levels. Steel cables placed under the plate were connected to a mechanical testing setup, and pull-out tests were conducted to evaluate fixation strength. Seven replicate specimens were fabricated to ensure repeatability and reliability of the results. Mean pull-out forces were 1784.4 ± 79.9 N for Sawbones, 1698.5 ± 134.3 N for Grid PLA (n = 7), and 1908.7 ± 335.2 N for Gyroid PLA (n = 7). Statistical analysis using a one-sample t-test showed that both 3D-printed models were non-inferior to the standard Sawbones model within a clinical acceptance margin of 15% (p < 0.05). Additively manufactured models exhibit mechanical pull-out performance that is statistically non-inferior to traditional composite bone block models. These findings confirm that 3D-printed PLA-based grid and gyroid structures serve as reliable, cost-effective alternatives for orthopaedic mechanical research without compromising mechanical integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06278-4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing

Osman İyibilgin, Utku Demirtaş, Levent Bayam, Erdinç Genç
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing

Osman İyibilgin, Utku Demirtaş, Levent Bayam, Erdinç Genç
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform biomechanical pull-out comparisons between composite bone blocks and additively manufactured bone models using locked plate and screw systems. The hypothesis posited that the mean pull-out force of the 3D-printed models would demonstrate non-inferior pull-out strength compared to standard composite bones within a clinically acceptable 15% margin. A standardized pull-out mechanism was developed to evaluate its biomechanical reliability and its potential as a customizable alternative. The study compared three groups: standard composite (Sawbones) blocks and two types of additively manufactured polylactic acid (PLA) blocks (grid and gyroid infill pattern), each measuring the same dimensions with 30% infill and mimicking a Sawbones block with 2 mm cortical thickness. A 6-hole LC-DCP titanium plate was fixed onto bone block models with dimensions of 29 × 170 × 42 mm using four screws, each measuring 36 mm in length, which were inserted perpendicularly and tightened to the same torque levels. Steel cables placed under the plate were connected to a mechanical testing setup, and pull-out tests were conducted to evaluate fixation strength. Seven replicate specimens were fabricated to ensure repeatability and reliability of the results. Mean pull-out forces were 1784.4 ± 79.9 N for Sawbones, 1698.5 ± 134.3 N for Grid PLA (n = 7), and 1908.7 ± 335.2 N for Gyroid PLA (n = 7). Statistical analysis using a one-sample t-test showed that both 3D-printed models were non-inferior to the standard Sawbones model within a clinical acceptance margin of 15% (p < 0.05). Additively manufactured models exhibit mechanical pull-out performance that is statistically non-inferior to traditional composite bone block models. These findings confirm that 3D-printed PLA-based grid and gyroid structures serve as reliable, cost-effective alternatives for orthopaedic mechanical research without compromising mechanical integrity.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
Sakarya University (TR), State Hospital (GB), Istanbul Medipol University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.