Improved Prostate Diffusion Imaging Using Deep Learning Denoising and Phase Correction With Ultra-High-Density Coil Array

Abstract Background MR Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), especially at high b-value, is a key acquisition to help identify clinically significant prostate cancer, however it suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), high noise floor, and susceptibility artifact. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of improving DWI quality using a novel 50-channel pelvic coil in conjunction with a deep learning (DL)-based phase correction and a DL-denoising algorithm. Methods In this prospective, single-center study, 24 consecutive men referred for prostate multiparametric MRI over 16 months were enrolled (age 47–79 years; mean, 68.1 years). Axial T2-weighted images and DWI were obtained using a prototype 50‑channel coil and standard clinical phased array (3 T Architect, GE HealthCare, USA). The DWI acquisitions were reconstructed with the vendor’s deep learning denoising algorithm (ARDL). The same raw data were reconstructed offline using an investigational DL Phase Correction algorithm with ARDL (DLPC+ARDL). Two independent readers scored DWI and ADC series using 4 qualitative criteria. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured on b = 1500 s/mm2 images. Combined reader scores were compared using the Wilcoxon matched‑pairs signed‑rank test, inter‑reader variability was assessed using Cohen’s κ, and quantitative SNR/CNR values were compared using two‑tailed paired t‑tests. Results Twenty men were analyzable for qualitative and 18 for quantitative metrics (reported as mean ± SD). 50‑channel pelvic coil with DLPC+ARDL produced the highest SNR (99.70 ± 28.50) and CNR (91.68 ± 44.39), exceeding 50‑channel with ARDL alone (SNR 56.44 ± 28.50; CNR 51.11 ± 28.67), 30‑channel anterior array with ARDL (SNR 31.41 ± 13.18; CNR 26.26 ± 13.52) and DLPC + ARDL (SNR 49.4 ± 18.6; CNR 44.7 ± 18.3) (all p < 0.0001). Reader scores favored DLPC+ARDL in prostate border definition, peripheral/transition zone distinction, lesion conspicuity, and confidence of extraprostatic extension (all p-values for DWI at b = 1500 s/mm2 < 0.0001; synthetic DWI at b = 2000 s/mm2: p = 7.5 × 10−7–0.01). Inter‑reader agreement was fair for acquired DWI (quadratic‑weighted κ = 0.34) and lower for synthetic DWI (κ = 0.19). Conclusion DWI images acquired using the 50‑channel pelvic coil and reconstructed with the DLPC + ARDL pipeline yield the highest image quality compared to ARDL only pipeline and to all 30-channel coil imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Advances
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/radadv/umag019
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Prostate Diffusion Imaging Using Deep Learning Denoising and Phase Correction With Ultra-High-Density Coil Array

Aytekin Oto, Ambereen Yousuf, Grace H. Lee, Patricia Lan et al.
Radiology Advances
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Improved Prostate Diffusion Imaging Using Deep Learning Denoising and Phase Correction With Ultra-High-Density Coil Array

Aytekin Oto, Ambereen Yousuf, Grace H. Lee, Patricia Lan, Xinzeng Wang, S. Huang, Clyve Follante, Milica Medved, Fraser Robb, Nurullah Kaya, Roger Engelmann, Jonathan Taylor, A. Guidon, Yunjeong Stickle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background MR Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), especially at high b-value, is a key acquisition to help identify clinically significant prostate cancer, however it suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), high noise floor, and susceptibility artifact. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of improving DWI quality using a novel 50-channel pelvic coil in conjunction with a deep learning (DL)-based phase correction and a DL-denoising algorithm. Methods In this prospective, single-center study, 24 consecutive men referred for prostate multiparametric MRI over 16 months were enrolled (age 47–79 years; mean, 68.1 years). Axial T2-weighted images and DWI were obtained using a prototype 50‑channel coil and standard clinical phased array (3 T Architect, GE HealthCare, USA). The DWI acquisitions were reconstructed with the vendor’s deep learning denoising algorithm (ARDL). The same raw data were reconstructed offline using an investigational DL Phase Correction algorithm with ARDL (DLPC+ARDL). Two independent readers scored DWI and ADC series using 4 qualitative criteria. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured on b = 1500 s/mm2 images. Combined reader scores were compared using the Wilcoxon matched‑pairs signed‑rank test, inter‑reader variability was assessed using Cohen’s κ, and quantitative SNR/CNR values were compared using two‑tailed paired t‑tests. Results Twenty men were analyzable for qualitative and 18 for quantitative metrics (reported as mean ± SD). 50‑channel pelvic coil with DLPC+ARDL produced the highest SNR (99.70 ± 28.50) and CNR (91.68 ± 44.39), exceeding 50‑channel with ARDL alone (SNR 56.44 ± 28.50; CNR 51.11 ± 28.67), 30‑channel anterior array with ARDL (SNR 31.41 ± 13.18; CNR 26.26 ± 13.52) and DLPC + ARDL (SNR 49.4 ± 18.6; CNR 44.7 ± 18.3) (all p < 0.0001). Reader scores favored DLPC+ARDL in prostate border definition, peripheral/transition zone distinction, lesion conspicuity, and confidence of extraprostatic extension (all p-values for DWI at b = 1500 s/mm2 < 0.0001; synthetic DWI at b = 2000 s/mm2: p = 7.5 × 10−7–0.01). Inter‑reader agreement was fair for acquired DWI (quadratic‑weighted κ = 0.34) and lower for synthetic DWI (κ = 0.19). Conclusion DWI images acquired using the 50‑channel pelvic coil and reconstructed with the DLPC + ARDL pipeline yield the highest image quality compared to ARDL only pipeline and to all 30-channel coil imaging.

Radiology Advances
General Electric (Spain) (ES), University of Chicago (US), Applied Sciences Laboratory (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.