ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH EMERGENCY MITIGATION STRATEGIES OF HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN BAYELSA STATE

Abstract This paper assessed the health emergency mitigation strategies for health institutions in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. The aims were to identify the common health hazards in institutions across Bayelsa State and to assess the mitigation strategies for public health emergencies in the health institutions in Bayelsa State. Descriptive research design was adopted targeting population of 5,086 health workers, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, community health officers, medical laboratory scientists, and other relevant staff. 735 health care workers were sampled in the study and distributed across primary, secondary, and tertiary care facilities. Data collection was carried out using structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used for data analyses. Results of descriptive statistics showed that common hazards identified in the health institutions were high workload (often 43.4%, always 24.6%), resource inadequacies (often 31.3%, 36.2% always), and challenging schedules (often 36.2%, always 31.3%). The results on institution-based mitigation strategies revealed that 56.5% of the workers agreed to the availability of institution-based mitigation strategies in their health centers. The results also showed that the availability of HIV-specific post-exposure prophylaxis, as emergency mitigation strategy, was highest among in tertiary facilities (64.4%), followed by 58.3% in secondary facilities and 46.5% in primary facilities, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p < 0.001). Similarly, regular staff training was highest in the tertiary facilities (50.7%) and lowest in primary facilities (35.4%), with a significant difference across levels of care (ꭓ2 = 14.69; p < 0.001). Access to PPE (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p – 0.001) and practice of proper hand-washing technique (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p – 0.001) were also significantly different across the levels of care. It was concluded that workload, resource inadequacy and schedule problems are common hazards in the health institution and there is substantial level of mitigation strategies available for health emergency situations in the health institutions in Bayelsa state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19285595
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH EMERGENCY MITIGATION STRATEGIES OF HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN BAYELSA STATE

Ejikeme Ugwoha, O. Abisoye, A. Ogoinja
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Response and Management
article

ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH EMERGENCY MITIGATION STRATEGIES OF HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN BAYELSA STATE

Ejikeme Ugwoha, O. Abisoye, A. Ogoinja
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper assessed the health emergency mitigation strategies for health institutions in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. The aims were to identify the common health hazards in institutions across Bayelsa State and to assess the mitigation strategies for public health emergencies in the health institutions in Bayelsa State. Descriptive research design was adopted targeting population of 5,086 health workers, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, community health officers, medical laboratory scientists, and other relevant staff. 735 health care workers were sampled in the study and distributed across primary, secondary, and tertiary care facilities. Data collection was carried out using structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used for data analyses. Results of descriptive statistics showed that common hazards identified in the health institutions were high workload (often 43.4%, always 24.6%), resource inadequacies (often 31.3%, 36.2% always), and challenging schedules (often 36.2%, always 31.3%). The results on institution-based mitigation strategies revealed that 56.5% of the workers agreed to the availability of institution-based mitigation strategies in their health centers. The results also showed that the availability of HIV-specific post-exposure prophylaxis, as emergency mitigation strategy, was highest among in tertiary facilities (64.4%), followed by 58.3% in secondary facilities and 46.5% in primary facilities, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p < 0.001). Similarly, regular staff training was highest in the tertiary facilities (50.7%) and lowest in primary facilities (35.4%), with a significant difference across levels of care (ꭓ2 = 14.69; p < 0.001). Access to PPE (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p – 0.001) and practice of proper hand-washing technique (ꭓ2 = 19.12; p – 0.001) were also significantly different across the levels of care. It was concluded that workload, resource inadequacy and schedule problems are common hazards in the health institution and there is substantial level of mitigation strategies available for health emergency situations in the health institutions in Bayelsa state.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Rivers State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.