Effect of Hammer Mill Particle Size on the Performance of NIR Prediction Models for Whole-Plant Corn Constituents

This study used a portable NIRS analyzer to explore the feasibility of modeling NIRS dry milling using hammer mill-prepared samples and determine the optimal particle size. 180 whole-plant corn samples from across China underwent four treatments: milling to cyclone 1.0 mm (control), hammer 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm. Samples underwent NIRS scanning followed by wet chemistry for DM, starch, and ash. PLS models were built for each constituent and particle size. Results showed the hammer 2.0 mm sample had significantly lower mean spectral absorbance than hammer 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm samples ( P < 0.05). Its spectral repeatability was similar to hammer 3.0 mm but significantly lower than hammer 4.0 mm ( P < 0.05). Among the prediction models, those for DM and starch at hammer 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm particle sizes performed best (R 2 c > 0.9, R 2 cv > 0.9, R 2 p > 0.9, RPD > 3), demonstrating practical a p plication potential. The Ash prediction model performed poorly overall (R 2 c < 0.8, R 2 cv < 0.6, R 2 p < 0.8, RPD < 3) and requires optimization. Considering spectral quality and model performance, hammer 2.0 mm was determined optimal for NIRS sample preparation. • Portable infrared device tested for corn milling analysis. • Found best corn particle size: 2.0 mm using hammer mill. • Accurately predicted corn starch and dry matter content. • Ash content prediction needs improvement for practical use. • Smaller corn particles gave clearer infrared signals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2026.109120
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Hammer Mill Particle Size on the Performance of NIR Prediction Models for Whole-Plant Corn Constituents

Hangshu Xin, Shuo Wang, Yaping Luo, Liuyang Cheng et al.
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
article

Effect of Hammer Mill Particle Size on the Performance of NIR Prediction Models for Whole-Plant Corn Constituents

Hangshu Xin, Shuo Wang, Yaping Luo, Liuyang Cheng, Tingyu Li, Bingyi Sun
article en

Abstract

This study used a portable NIRS analyzer to explore the feasibility of modeling NIRS dry milling using hammer mill-prepared samples and determine the optimal particle size. 180 whole-plant corn samples from across China underwent four treatments: milling to cyclone 1.0 mm (control), hammer 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm. Samples underwent NIRS scanning followed by wet chemistry for DM, starch, and ash. PLS models were built for each constituent and particle size. Results showed the hammer 2.0 mm sample had significantly lower mean spectral absorbance than hammer 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm samples ( P < 0.05). Its spectral repeatability was similar to hammer 3.0 mm but significantly lower than hammer 4.0 mm ( P < 0.05). Among the prediction models, those for DM and starch at hammer 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm particle sizes performed best (R 2 c > 0.9, R 2 cv > 0.9, R 2 p > 0.9, RPD > 3), demonstrating practical a p plication potential. The Ash prediction model performed poorly overall (R 2 c < 0.8, R 2 cv < 0.6, R 2 p < 0.8, RPD < 3) and requires optimization. Considering spectral quality and model performance, hammer 2.0 mm was determined optimal for NIRS sample preparation. • Portable infrared device tested for corn milling analysis. • Found best corn particle size: 2.0 mm using hammer mill. • Accurately predicted corn starch and dry matter content. • Ash content prediction needs improvement for practical use. • Smaller corn particles gave clearer infrared signals.

Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Northeast Agricultural University (CN), Qingdao Center of Resource Chemistry and New Materials (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.