Impact of peat depth on soil conditions, plant growth, and greenhouse gas emissions on a boreal agricultural drained peatland

Drained agricultural peatlands are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Peat thickness typically varies widely between sites due to cultivation history, but its effect on soil conditions, plant growth, and GHG emissions are poorly understood and seldom considered in national GHG inventories and emission mitigation strategies. Here, we present a three-year study of a drained agricultural peatland in northern Finland, with peat depth ranging from 20 to 80 cm. We measured soil properties, plant growth and GHG fluxes, to evaluate how peat depth influences ecosystem processes and emissions. Plots with deeper peat exhibited more stable and shallow water table depth (WTD), and had higher peaks in soil nitrate concentrations, but these differences did not result in significant changes in soil moisture, plant growth, or GHG fluxes. However, we observed periods when drier conditions in mull soil limited ecosystem respiration (R e ), while WTD indicated a stronger negative effect on R e and a positive effect on CH₄ fluxes in plots with deeper peat layer. Our results suggest that peat depth alone does not improve GHG inventories since shallow-peated drained peatlands can have as high GHG emissions as the thicker ones, and hydrological parameters should be prioritized instead. However, mitigation measures such as rewetting can still be targeted towards fields with thicker peat layer, as larger soil organic carbon stocks can be affected, and rewetting is likely easier due to more stable WTD and higher water holding capacity. • Three-year study on Finnish agricultural peatland explores GHG fluxes across peat depths. • Nitrate concentrations were positively correlated with peat depth. • Water table dynamics differed between shallow and deep peat soils. • Peat depth did not significantly affect soil moisture, plant growth or GHG fluxes. • Categorizing peatlands by depth may not improve accuracy of GHG inventories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2026.110400
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of peat depth on soil conditions, plant growth, and greenhouse gas emissions on a boreal agricultural drained peatland

Miika Läpikivi, Jari Liski, Maarit Liimatainen, Henriikka Vekuri et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

Impact of peat depth on soil conditions, plant growth, and greenhouse gas emissions on a boreal agricultural drained peatland

Miika Läpikivi, Jari Liski, Maarit Liimatainen, Henriikka Vekuri, Annalea Lohila, Timo Lötjönen, Liisa Kulmala, Milla Niiranen, Erkki Joki-Tokola, Hannu Marttila
article en

Abstract

Drained agricultural peatlands are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Peat thickness typically varies widely between sites due to cultivation history, but its effect on soil conditions, plant growth, and GHG emissions are poorly understood and seldom considered in national GHG inventories and emission mitigation strategies. Here, we present a three-year study of a drained agricultural peatland in northern Finland, with peat depth ranging from 20 to 80 cm. We measured soil properties, plant growth and GHG fluxes, to evaluate how peat depth influences ecosystem processes and emissions. Plots with deeper peat exhibited more stable and shallow water table depth (WTD), and had higher peaks in soil nitrate concentrations, but these differences did not result in significant changes in soil moisture, plant growth, or GHG fluxes. However, we observed periods when drier conditions in mull soil limited ecosystem respiration (R e ), while WTD indicated a stronger negative effect on R e and a positive effect on CH₄ fluxes in plots with deeper peat layer. Our results suggest that peat depth alone does not improve GHG inventories since shallow-peated drained peatlands can have as high GHG emissions as the thicker ones, and hydrological parameters should be prioritized instead. However, mitigation measures such as rewetting can still be targeted towards fields with thicker peat layer, as larger soil organic carbon stocks can be affected, and rewetting is likely easier due to more stable WTD and higher water holding capacity. • Three-year study on Finnish agricultural peatland explores GHG fluxes across peat depths. • Nitrate concentrations were positively correlated with peat depth. • Water table dynamics differed between shallow and deep peat soils. • Peat depth did not significantly affect soil moisture, plant growth or GHG fluxes. • Categorizing peatlands by depth may not improve accuracy of GHG inventories.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 405
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.