RAPid simPLE (RAPPLE) targeted radiation treatment versus whole brain radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study of matched patients with brain metastases and poor prognosis

Purpose: Patients with brain metastases whose poor prognosis does not warrant stereotactic radiosurgery often receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).We compared the outcomes of patients treated with a novel brain-sparing radiotherapy technique with those of matched patients treated with WBRT.Materials/Methods: RAPPLE uses single-isocenter, coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy to target brain metastases with 20 Gy in 5 fractions.Patients treated with a first course of RAPPLE between January 1, 2017, and November 5, 2021, were identified in an institutional database.Using age, cancer diagnosis, number of brain metastases and treatment date, we 1:1-matched patients that received RAPPLE and WBRT.Endpoints were overall survival (OS), calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and cumulative incidence of intracranial progression with a competing risk of death.Log-rank, Gray's test, Cox regression and Fine-Gray analyses were used for comparisons.Ten cases treated with 35 Gy in 5 fractions linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), selected to have one through 10 brain metastases, were replanned using RAPPLE to compare the mean dose to Brain minus gross tumor volume (GTV). Results:The study cohort comprised 248 patients.Median survival was 4.5 months for RAPPLE and 4.0 months for WBRT (Log-rank p = 0.4), and 18-month survival was 11% (95% CI: 7-19) for RAPPLE and 12% (95% CI: 8-19) for WBRT.On multivariable analysis, using RAPPLE versus WBRT was not predictive of OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.62-1.09,p = 0.2).The 18-month cumulative incidence of intracranial progression was 50% (95% CI: 41-59) for RAPPLE and 31% (95% CI: 23-40) for WBRT (Gray's test p = 0.002).After RAPPLE, 12% received more focal RT, and 3% required salvage WBRT.The mean dose to Brain-GTV was 5.04 Gy for SRS and 4.31 Gy for RAPPLE.Conclusions: There was no difference in survival between the matched groups.RAPPLE spares brain as well as linear accelerator SRS for patients with 1-10 brain metastases.Among patients treated with RAPPLE, 97% avoided WBRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2026.102034
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RAPid simPLE (RAPPLE) targeted radiation treatment versus whole brain radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study of matched patients with brain metastases and poor prognosis

Shilo Lefresne, A. Nichol, Eric Berthelet, Hannah Carolan et al.
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

RAPid simPLE (RAPPLE) targeted radiation treatment versus whole brain radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study of matched patients with brain metastases and poor prognosis

Shilo Lefresne, A. Nichol, Eric Berthelet, Hannah Carolan, Jeremy Hamm, Gurjit Parmar, John Chan, Tim Kong, Mitchell Liu, Richard Musoke
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with brain metastases whose poor prognosis does not warrant stereotactic radiosurgery often receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).We compared the outcomes of patients treated with a novel brain-sparing radiotherapy technique with those of matched patients treated with WBRT.Materials/Methods: RAPPLE uses single-isocenter, coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy to target brain metastases with 20 Gy in 5 fractions.Patients treated with a first course of RAPPLE between January 1, 2017, and November 5, 2021, were identified in an institutional database.Using age, cancer diagnosis, number of brain metastases and treatment date, we 1:1-matched patients that received RAPPLE and WBRT.Endpoints were overall survival (OS), calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and cumulative incidence of intracranial progression with a competing risk of death.Log-rank, Gray's test, Cox regression and Fine-Gray analyses were used for comparisons.Ten cases treated with 35 Gy in 5 fractions linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), selected to have one through 10 brain metastases, were replanned using RAPPLE to compare the mean dose to Brain minus gross tumor volume (GTV). Results:The study cohort comprised 248 patients.Median survival was 4.5 months for RAPPLE and 4.0 months for WBRT (Log-rank p = 0.4), and 18-month survival was 11% (95% CI: 7-19) for RAPPLE and 12% (95% CI: 8-19) for WBRT.On multivariable analysis, using RAPPLE versus WBRT was not predictive of OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.62-1.09,p = 0.2).The 18-month cumulative incidence of intracranial progression was 50% (95% CI: 41-59) for RAPPLE and 31% (95% CI: 23-40) for WBRT (Gray's test p = 0.002).After RAPPLE, 12% received more focal RT, and 3% required salvage WBRT.The mean dose to Brain-GTV was 5.04 Gy for SRS and 4.31 Gy for RAPPLE.Conclusions: There was no difference in survival between the matched groups.RAPPLE spares brain as well as linear accelerator SRS for patients with 1-10 brain metastases.Among patients treated with RAPPLE, 97% avoided WBRT.

Advances in Radiation Oncology
University of British Columbia (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.