Evaluating migratory fish passage at partial migration barriers in a social-ecological riverscape

Anthropogenic partial barriers, such as low-head locks and dams, fragment social-ecological riverscapes and limit migratory fish access to historical spawning habitats, creating trade-offs between ecological conservation and human needs. Fish passage mitigation strategies at three low-head locks and dams (LD1, LD2, and LD3) on the Cape Fear River, North Carolina (USA), across two contrasting mitigation regimes (2013–2015 and 2022–2023) included (i) a nature-like fishway at LD1 (original and modified designs), (ii) conservation locking at LD2 and LD3, and (iii) environmental flow (e-flow) prescriptions (i.e., dam submergence flows) when locks were inoperable. We evaluated passage of American shad ( Alosa sapidissima ) and striped bass ( Morone saxatilis ) using acoustic telemetry and multistate models within a Bayesian framework to estimate upstream passage probabilities under varying flow conditions and management regimes. Passage probabilities for both species were higher in 2013–2015 when conservation locking was conducted. In contrast, passage declined when locks were inoperable and only e-flows allowed passage during dam submergence events in 2022–2023. Flow positively influenced passage, with strongest effects for striped bass; however, the nature-like fishway exhibited consistently low passage probability, and modifications did not improve passage probabilities. Given low passage probabilities during the recent mitigation period, improving longitudinal connectivity for diadromous fish in this river necessitates flexible, integrated operational, structural, and flow-based strategies. Possible future mitigation actions to improve fish passage could include resuming conservation locking (operational), structural interventions such as bypass channel construction and dam height lowering that extends dam submergence, and continued use of e-flows (flow-based). • Multistate models quantified passage probabilities across mitigation regimes. • Passage probabilities were highest when conservation locking occurred. • Flow strongly influenced fish passage probabilities. • Nature-like fishway showed similar passage probabilities pre- and post-modification. • Multi-approach strategies are likely needed to improve ecological connectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107980
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating migratory fish passage at partial migration barriers in a social-ecological riverscape

Dennis R. DeVries, Aaron J. Bunch, Joshua K. Raabe, Troy M. Farmer et al.
Ecological Engineering
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Evaluating migratory fish passage at partial migration barriers in a social-ecological riverscape

Dennis R. DeVries, Aaron J. Bunch, Joshua K. Raabe, Troy M. Farmer, Julie E. DeMeester, Kyle T. Rachels, Henry Hershey, Joseph J. Facendola, Fred S. Scharf, Margaret A. Gaither, David L. Smith
article en

Abstract

Anthropogenic partial barriers, such as low-head locks and dams, fragment social-ecological riverscapes and limit migratory fish access to historical spawning habitats, creating trade-offs between ecological conservation and human needs. Fish passage mitigation strategies at three low-head locks and dams (LD1, LD2, and LD3) on the Cape Fear River, North Carolina (USA), across two contrasting mitigation regimes (2013–2015 and 2022–2023) included (i) a nature-like fishway at LD1 (original and modified designs), (ii) conservation locking at LD2 and LD3, and (iii) environmental flow (e-flow) prescriptions (i.e., dam submergence flows) when locks were inoperable. We evaluated passage of American shad ( Alosa sapidissima ) and striped bass ( Morone saxatilis ) using acoustic telemetry and multistate models within a Bayesian framework to estimate upstream passage probabilities under varying flow conditions and management regimes. Passage probabilities for both species were higher in 2013–2015 when conservation locking was conducted. In contrast, passage declined when locks were inoperable and only e-flows allowed passage during dam submergence events in 2022–2023. Flow positively influenced passage, with strongest effects for striped bass; however, the nature-like fishway exhibited consistently low passage probability, and modifications did not improve passage probabilities. Given low passage probabilities during the recent mitigation period, improving longitudinal connectivity for diadromous fish in this river necessitates flexible, integrated operational, structural, and flow-based strategies. Possible future mitigation actions to improve fish passage could include resuming conservation locking (operational), structural interventions such as bypass channel construction and dam height lowering that extends dam submergence, and continued use of e-flows (flow-based). • Multistate models quantified passage probabilities across mitigation regimes. • Passage probabilities were highest when conservation locking occurred. • Flow strongly influenced fish passage probabilities. • Nature-like fishway showed similar passage probabilities pre- and post-modification. • Multi-approach strategies are likely needed to improve ecological connectivity.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 227
The Nature Conservancy (US), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (US), Clemson University (US), Auburn University (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.