Generative AI in a High School English Career Preparation Units: Student Interactions, Perceptions, and Ethical Concerns

The rapid integration of generative AI into K–12 education presents both opportunities and challenges for supporting students’ learning. This mixed-methods case study examined how high school students interacted with an AI-enhanced resume writing unit and a text-based mock interview unit within an English Language Arts course. Quantitative results indicated students’ positive perceptions of AI utility across constructs of awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics. Qualitative analysis revealed that students used AI to explore career information, generate and refine resume content, and iteratively revise and refine interview responses. While many students engaged critically—questioning, personalizing, and revising AI suggestions—others adopted a more passive or overly dependent approach. Students reported feeling more confident and valued individualized feedback, yet they also identified challenges such as AI’s generic or decontextualized responses, difficulties interpreting AI feedback, and ethical concerns regarding authenticity, plagiarism, and overreliance. This study argues that meaningful integration of generative AI in secondary classrooms requires explicit instruction in prompting, verification, and critical evaluation so that students develop both the agency and the skills necessary to use AI as a scaffold rather than a substitute for learning. • Students showed varied agency, from critical engagement to passive AI reliance. • AI-supported tasks enhanced students’ confidence in resume writing and interviews. • Challenges included generic feedback, clarity issues, and concerns about authenticity. • Findings highlight need for explicit instruction in AI literacy and ethical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100588
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in a High School English Career Preparation Units: Student Interactions, Perceptions, and Ethical Concerns

Kyungbin Kwon, Uğur Kale, Sohheon Yang, Juhyun Park et al.
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Generative AI in a High School English Career Preparation Units: Student Interactions, Perceptions, and Ethical Concerns

Kyungbin Kwon, Uğur Kale, Sohheon Yang, Juhyun Park, Keunjae Kim
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative AI into K–12 education presents both opportunities and challenges for supporting students’ learning. This mixed-methods case study examined how high school students interacted with an AI-enhanced resume writing unit and a text-based mock interview unit within an English Language Arts course. Quantitative results indicated students’ positive perceptions of AI utility across constructs of awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics. Qualitative analysis revealed that students used AI to explore career information, generate and refine resume content, and iteratively revise and refine interview responses. While many students engaged critically—questioning, personalizing, and revising AI suggestions—others adopted a more passive or overly dependent approach. Students reported feeling more confident and valued individualized feedback, yet they also identified challenges such as AI’s generic or decontextualized responses, difficulties interpreting AI feedback, and ethical concerns regarding authenticity, plagiarism, and overreliance. This study argues that meaningful integration of generative AI in secondary classrooms requires explicit instruction in prompting, verification, and critical evaluation so that students develop both the agency and the skills necessary to use AI as a scaffold rather than a substitute for learning. • Students showed varied agency, from critical engagement to passive AI reliance. • AI-supported tasks enhanced students’ confidence in resume writing and interviews. • Challenges included generic feedback, clarity issues, and concerns about authenticity. • Findings highlight need for explicit instruction in AI literacy and ethical use.

Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US), Indiana University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.