“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants

This study examines whether the political appointment of federal judges influenced the sentencing of individuals charged in connection with the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection. Using a novel dataset covering the full population of nearly 1,500 defendants with charges filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, we leverage random case assignment procedures to better understand the sentences that were imposed for each defendant. Our findings indicate that there were no significant partisan differences in terms of the imposition of incarceration or sentence length by these district judges. However, when disaggregating by individual presidents we find that distinct patterns are evident. These findings highlight the nuanced and sometimes unexpected ways appointment effects manifest in politically sensitive cases. They also underscore the significance of district judges amid ongoing legal conflicts involving presidential power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261438494
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants

Jason S. Byers, Ethan D. Boldt, Hayley Munir, Michael C. Gizzi
Political Research Quarterly
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants

Jason S. Byers, Ethan D. Boldt, Hayley Munir, Michael C. Gizzi
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether the political appointment of federal judges influenced the sentencing of individuals charged in connection with the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection. Using a novel dataset covering the full population of nearly 1,500 defendants with charges filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, we leverage random case assignment procedures to better understand the sentences that were imposed for each defendant. Our findings indicate that there were no significant partisan differences in terms of the imposition of incarceration or sentence length by these district judges. However, when disaggregating by individual presidents we find that distinct patterns are evident. These findings highlight the nuanced and sometimes unexpected ways appointment effects manifest in politically sensitive cases. They also underscore the significance of district judges amid ongoing legal conflicts involving presidential power.

Political Research Quarterly
University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Illinois State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Stop the Steal” Sentenced: An Analysis of Judge Appointment Effects on the Sentencing of January 6 Defendants — Jason S. Byers, Ethan D. Boldt, et al. · Political Research Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS