Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success

<p style="text-align:justify;"> Background: This study aimed to compare maximum stone length and stone volume as predictors of stone-free (SF) status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for ureteral stones. <p style="text-align:justify;"> Methods: Data from 236 patients treated with SWL for solitary radiopaque ureteral stone (5–15 mm) between January 2022 and March 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Stone length and volume were measured on noncontrast computed tomography. SF status was determined on radiography and ultrasonography 4 weeks after the last SWL session and defined as no residual stone or < 4 mm residual fragments. Binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate potential predictors of SWL outcome in univariable and multivariable analyses. <p style="text-align:justify;"> Results: The overall SF rate was 68%. The non-SF group had significantly higher body mass index (BMI), Hounsfield unit, maximum stone length, stone volume, skin-to-stone distance and proximal ureteral diameter (all p < 0.05) compared with the SF group. Multivariate analysis revealed maximum stone length (p = 0.004) and BMI (p = 0.009) as independent predictors of SWL outcome, whilst stone volume lost statistical significance (p = 0.2). <div style="text-align:justify;"> Conclusions: Simple linear stone measurement without routine reliance on computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric assessment appears sufficient for predicting SWL outcomes in ureteral stones. This approach may help avoid the time-consuming nature and potential radiation exposure associated with volumetric analysis. Further prospective, multicentre studies with standardised imaging and large patient cohorts are warranted to confirm these results. </div> <div> <br /> </div>

Publication Details

Journal
Archivos Españoles de Urología
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267902.29
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success

Archivos Españoles de Urología
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Comparison of Ureteral Stone Volume and Maximum Stone Length in Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success

article en

Abstract

<p style="text-align:justify;"> Background: This study aimed to compare maximum stone length and stone volume as predictors of stone-free (SF) status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for ureteral stones. <p style="text-align:justify;"> Methods: Data from 236 patients treated with SWL for solitary radiopaque ureteral stone (5–15 mm) between January 2022 and March 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Stone length and volume were measured on noncontrast computed tomography. SF status was determined on radiography and ultrasonography 4 weeks after the last SWL session and defined as no residual stone or < 4 mm residual fragments. Binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate potential predictors of SWL outcome in univariable and multivariable analyses. <p style="text-align:justify;"> Results: The overall SF rate was 68%. The non-SF group had significantly higher body mass index (BMI), Hounsfield unit, maximum stone length, stone volume, skin-to-stone distance and proximal ureteral diameter (all p < 0.05) compared with the SF group. Multivariate analysis revealed maximum stone length (p = 0.004) and BMI (p = 0.009) as independent predictors of SWL outcome, whilst stone volume lost statistical significance (p = 0.2). <div style="text-align:justify;"> Conclusions: Simple linear stone measurement without routine reliance on computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric assessment appears sufficient for predicting SWL outcomes in ureteral stones. This approach may help avoid the time-consuming nature and potential radiation exposure associated with volumetric analysis. Further prospective, multicentre studies with standardised imaging and large patient cohorts are warranted to confirm these results. </div> <div> <br /> </div>

Archivos Españoles de UrologíaVol. 79(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.