Analysis of 2024 Maarif Model geometry learning outcomes according to Van Hiele levels

Curriculum programs, which shape the quality of education and guide teaching–learning processes, are continuously updated in response to changing societal needs and expectations. In Türkiye, curriculum reform has been implemented through the Türkiye Century Maarif Model (TCMM) in the 2024–2025 academic year. Within this framework, the renewed mathematics curriculum seeks to restructure mathematics teaching by emphasizing critical thinking, problem solving, and reasoning. As the program was first implemented at the transition grades of 5th and 9th levels, systematic evaluation is essential to inform future development. However, since the TCMM Mathematics Teaching Program has only recently been introduced, empirical research examining its structure and implications remains limited.This study addresses this gap by analyzing the cognitive structure of geometry learning outcomes in the renewed curriculum. Specifically, 68 geometry learning outcomes and 313 associated process components across the themes of Geometric Shapes, Geometric Quantities, Transformation, Congruence and Similarity, and Geometric Solids at middle and high school levels were examined using the Van Hiele Geometric Thinking Model. Learning outcomes were classified according to the model’s five hierarchical levels of geometric thinking. The findings indicate that the majority of learning outcomes are concentrated at the informal deduction level (Level 3). At the middle school level, outcomes corresponding to visualization (Level 1) and descriptive analysis (Level 2) are limited. Although formal deduction (Level 4) appears at the high school level, no outcomes were identified at the rigor level (Level 5). Overall, geometry learning outcomes in the TCMM predominantly emphasize informal deduction across both educational stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1683664
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of 2024 Maarif Model geometry learning outcomes according to Van Hiele levels

G. Unsal, Meltem Sarı
Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Analysis of 2024 Maarif Model geometry learning outcomes according to Van Hiele levels

G. Unsal, Meltem Sarı
article en

Abstract

Curriculum programs, which shape the quality of education and guide teaching–learning processes, are continuously updated in response to changing societal needs and expectations. In Türkiye, curriculum reform has been implemented through the Türkiye Century Maarif Model (TCMM) in the 2024–2025 academic year. Within this framework, the renewed mathematics curriculum seeks to restructure mathematics teaching by emphasizing critical thinking, problem solving, and reasoning. As the program was first implemented at the transition grades of 5th and 9th levels, systematic evaluation is essential to inform future development. However, since the TCMM Mathematics Teaching Program has only recently been introduced, empirical research examining its structure and implications remains limited.This study addresses this gap by analyzing the cognitive structure of geometry learning outcomes in the renewed curriculum. Specifically, 68 geometry learning outcomes and 313 associated process components across the themes of Geometric Shapes, Geometric Quantities, Transformation, Congruence and Similarity, and Geometric Solids at middle and high school levels were examined using the Van Hiele Geometric Thinking Model. Learning outcomes were classified according to the model’s five hierarchical levels of geometric thinking. The findings indicate that the majority of learning outcomes are concentrated at the informal deduction level (Level 3). At the middle school level, outcomes corresponding to visualization (Level 1) and descriptive analysis (Level 2) are limited. Although formal deduction (Level 4) appears at the high school level, no outcomes were identified at the rigor level (Level 5). Overall, geometry learning outcomes in the TCMM predominantly emphasize informal deduction across both educational stages.

Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri DergisiVol. 14(1)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.