P6: Black Holes as Central Gravitational Vortices Lacking Singularities: The Universal Centrality Rule

The standard interpretation of black holes as objects containing a central singularity of infinite density is a consequence of applying classical general relativity beyond its range of validity. This paper proposes an alternative interpretation grounded in the dynamics of the Kerr metric: black holes are gravitational vortices whose event horizons mark a relativistic causal boundary in the exterior geometry, without requiring any physically established central singularity. The event horizon is interpreted physically as a relativistic causal boundary of the exterior metric, while the familiar Newtonian escape-velocity analogy is retained only as a heuristic and not as a literal derivation of the horizon. The Kerr metric for rotating black holes naturally describes a vortex structure, with the ergosphere, frame-dragging, and ring structure all following from vortex dynamics. The formal singular structure at r = 0 in the Kerr solution is interpreted as a signal that the classical interior description has been extended beyond its physical domain, rather than as a directly established infinite-density physical object, consistent with the mathematical literature on the Kerr metric.Every directly confirmed observational feature of black hole candidates is shown to be consistent with the vortex interpretation: event horizons, accretion disks, relativistic jets, gravitational lensing, gravitational wave emission from mergers, and the black hole shadow images obtained by the Event Horizon Telescope. Flat or flattened galactic rotation-curve behaviour is shown to arise plausibly from the angular momentum distribution of galactic vortex structures in proof-of-concept N-body simulation, without hidden mass. The standard black hole information paradox is substantially weakened under the vortex interpretation because the central singularity is no longer treated as a physically established mechanism of information destruction.This paper further develops the Universal Centrality Rule: the observational fact that in the complete record spanning all surveys, all instruments, all redshifts, and all galaxy morphologies, no confirmed stable rotating galaxy has been observed with a supermassive mass concentration displaced beyond barycenter-consistent limits. The paper derives this zero-exception universality as a structural necessity of the gravitational vortex interpretation. The vortex interpretation explains what galactic black holes are; the centrality rule explains why they are always and only found at the dynamical centre of the systems that produce them.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19300874
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

P6: Black Holes as Central Gravitational Vortices Lacking Singularities: The Universal Centrality Rule

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
preprint

P6: Black Holes as Central Gravitational Vortices Lacking Singularities: The Universal Centrality Rule

preprint en

Abstract

The standard interpretation of black holes as objects containing a central singularity of infinite density is a consequence of applying classical general relativity beyond its range of validity. This paper proposes an alternative interpretation grounded in the dynamics of the Kerr metric: black holes are gravitational vortices whose event horizons mark a relativistic causal boundary in the exterior geometry, without requiring any physically established central singularity. The event horizon is interpreted physically as a relativistic causal boundary of the exterior metric, while the familiar Newtonian escape-velocity analogy is retained only as a heuristic and not as a literal derivation of the horizon. The Kerr metric for rotating black holes naturally describes a vortex structure, with the ergosphere, frame-dragging, and ring structure all following from vortex dynamics. The formal singular structure at r = 0 in the Kerr solution is interpreted as a signal that the classical interior description has been extended beyond its physical domain, rather than as a directly established infinite-density physical object, consistent with the mathematical literature on the Kerr metric.Every directly confirmed observational feature of black hole candidates is shown to be consistent with the vortex interpretation: event horizons, accretion disks, relativistic jets, gravitational lensing, gravitational wave emission from mergers, and the black hole shadow images obtained by the Event Horizon Telescope. Flat or flattened galactic rotation-curve behaviour is shown to arise plausibly from the angular momentum distribution of galactic vortex structures in proof-of-concept N-body simulation, without hidden mass. The standard black hole information paradox is substantially weakened under the vortex interpretation because the central singularity is no longer treated as a physically established mechanism of information destruction.This paper further develops the Universal Centrality Rule: the observational fact that in the complete record spanning all surveys, all instruments, all redshifts, and all galaxy morphologies, no confirmed stable rotating galaxy has been observed with a supermassive mass concentration displaced beyond barycenter-consistent limits. The paper derives this zero-exception universality as a structural necessity of the gravitational vortex interpretation. The vortex interpretation explains what galactic black holes are; the centrality rule explains why they are always and only found at the dynamical centre of the systems that produce them.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.