Prediction of Solidified Microstructure in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Inconel 718 using Physics-aware Machine Learning

Accurate prediction of the solidified microstructure in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-processed components is critical because heterogeneity and spatial anisotropy in the solidified microstructure lead to variation in functional properties. This paper presents a physics-aware, real-time, data-integrated machine learning approach for predicting the solidified microstructure of LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts. Currently, the prediction of solidified microstructure in LPBF is realized primarily through three approaches: (i) empirical modeling; (ii) blackbox modeling using in-situ sensor data; and (iii) whitebox modeling leveraging physics-based process simulations. Each of these approaches has inherent limitations. Empirical and blackbox models lack generalizability because they do not account for geometry-dependent causal thermal-fluid phenomena governing microstructural evolution. Physics-based whitebox models are computationally demanding and overlook the stochasticity inherent to the process. To overcome the foregoing limitations, this work establishes a graybox modeling approach. This approach combines temperature fields predicted by a physics-based thermal model with real-time data acquired from in situ infrared thermal imaging and optical tomography sensors. The graybox model is trained to predict the following microstructural aspects of LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts: melt pool depth; primary dendritic arm spacing; crystallographic texture, orientation, and grain aspect ratio; and microhardness. The graybox model predicted the solidified microstructure with an accuracy approaching 95% (R²). By contrast, the prediction accuracy of blackbox and physics-based whitebox models ranged between R² ~ 60% and 85%. Thus, this work takes a critical step towards a rapid, accurate, in-situ, and non-destructive Born Qualified assessment of LPBF part quality. • Physics-aware machine learning (graybox modeling) approach for predicting solidified microstructure in LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts. • Approach integrates lightweight computational thermal modeling and real-time, in-situ multi-sensor data. • Approach validated on Inconel 718 parts (12 parts) with varying processing conditions and design conditions. • Four aspects of solidified microstructure were predicted - meltpool depth, dendritic spacing, grain structure (aspect ratio, orientation, grain size, and texture), and microhardness • Graybox modeling approach fusing sensor signatures and simulation-derived thermal metrics predicts with a statistical accuracy exceeding 90% (R 2 ) • Purely data-driven machine learning (blackbox modeling) and physics-based modeling (whitebox modeling) have predictability in the range of 60% - 85% (R 2 )

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive manufacturing
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2026.105174
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Solidified Microstructure in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Inconel 718 using Physics-aware Machine Learning

Alex Riensche, Reza Mirzaeifar, Mihir Darji, Prahalada Rao et al.
Additive manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Prediction of Solidified Microstructure in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Inconel 718 using Physics-aware Machine Learning

Alex Riensche, Reza Mirzaeifar, Mihir Darji, Prahalada Rao, Swayam Kudale, Kaustubh Deshmukh, Christopher B. Williams
article en

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the solidified microstructure in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-processed components is critical because heterogeneity and spatial anisotropy in the solidified microstructure lead to variation in functional properties. This paper presents a physics-aware, real-time, data-integrated machine learning approach for predicting the solidified microstructure of LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts. Currently, the prediction of solidified microstructure in LPBF is realized primarily through three approaches: (i) empirical modeling; (ii) blackbox modeling using in-situ sensor data; and (iii) whitebox modeling leveraging physics-based process simulations. Each of these approaches has inherent limitations. Empirical and blackbox models lack generalizability because they do not account for geometry-dependent causal thermal-fluid phenomena governing microstructural evolution. Physics-based whitebox models are computationally demanding and overlook the stochasticity inherent to the process. To overcome the foregoing limitations, this work establishes a graybox modeling approach. This approach combines temperature fields predicted by a physics-based thermal model with real-time data acquired from in situ infrared thermal imaging and optical tomography sensors. The graybox model is trained to predict the following microstructural aspects of LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts: melt pool depth; primary dendritic arm spacing; crystallographic texture, orientation, and grain aspect ratio; and microhardness. The graybox model predicted the solidified microstructure with an accuracy approaching 95% (R²). By contrast, the prediction accuracy of blackbox and physics-based whitebox models ranged between R² ~ 60% and 85%. Thus, this work takes a critical step towards a rapid, accurate, in-situ, and non-destructive Born Qualified assessment of LPBF part quality. • Physics-aware machine learning (graybox modeling) approach for predicting solidified microstructure in LPBF-processed Inconel 718 parts. • Approach integrates lightweight computational thermal modeling and real-time, in-situ multi-sensor data. • Approach validated on Inconel 718 parts (12 parts) with varying processing conditions and design conditions. • Four aspects of solidified microstructure were predicted - meltpool depth, dendritic spacing, grain structure (aspect ratio, orientation, grain size, and texture), and microhardness • Graybox modeling approach fusing sensor signatures and simulation-derived thermal metrics predicts with a statistical accuracy exceeding 90% (R 2 ) • Purely data-driven machine learning (blackbox modeling) and physics-based modeling (whitebox modeling) have predictability in the range of 60% - 85% (R 2 )

Additive manufacturing
Virginia Tech (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.