‘ <i>Uganda likes refugees too much</i> ’: domestic narratives on refugee protection

Abstract As one of the largest hosts of refugees in Africa and globally, Uganda has been studied from a variety of perspectives. However, one major research gap is the domestic political role of refugees in Uganda—how are refugees considered in domestic narratives, and to what political gain? We show that two dominant, politically influential positive narratives focus on the benefits of community development and shared Pan-African identity. These narratives are especially impactful at the local level, where economic gains from supporting refugees often translate into political capital. Negative narratives do exist, but focus more on perceived deprivations for Ugandans, not on blaming refugees. Political elites only give limited attention to concerns like security, land, and environmental degradation, as positive narratives on refugee protection offer greater political capital. The paper draws on a variety of data, including parliamentary debates and newspapers sources in addition to interviews and focus group discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feag003
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘ Uganda likes refugees too much ’: domestic narratives on refugee protection

Kalyango Ronald Sebba, Franzisca Zanker
Journal of Refugee Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

‘ Uganda likes refugees too much ’: domestic narratives on refugee protection

Kalyango Ronald Sebba, Franzisca Zanker
article en

Abstract

Abstract As one of the largest hosts of refugees in Africa and globally, Uganda has been studied from a variety of perspectives. However, one major research gap is the domestic political role of refugees in Uganda—how are refugees considered in domestic narratives, and to what political gain? We show that two dominant, politically influential positive narratives focus on the benefits of community development and shared Pan-African identity. These narratives are especially impactful at the local level, where economic gains from supporting refugees often translate into political capital. Negative narratives do exist, but focus more on perceived deprivations for Ugandans, not on blaming refugees. Political elites only give limited attention to concerns like security, land, and environmental degradation, as positive narratives on refugee protection offer greater political capital. The paper draws on a variety of data, including parliamentary debates and newspapers sources in addition to interviews and focus group discussions.

Journal of Refugee Studies
University of Freiburg (DE), Kyambogo University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘ <i>Uganda likes refugees too much</i> ’: domestic narratives on refugee protection — Kalyango Ronald Sebba, Franzisca Zanker · Journal of Refugee Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS