Implicit memory and judgments of learning: testing the boundarie of subliminal influence

Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are prospective metamemory judgments critical for intentional learning, and have been theorized to be, in part, supported by implicit memory processes. This study tested the boundaries of subliminal implicit memory's influence on JOLs by presenting masked primes, antiprimes, and neutral stimuli either before encoding (Pre-Study) or before JOL elicitation (Pre-JOL) in 96 neurotypical undergraduates across the two presentation conditions (<i>n</i> = 48 each). We assessed JOL calibration, resolution, recall accuracy, and reaction times. Subliminal stimuli showed no effects (equivalence testing, <i>p</i> < .01, with an equivalence bound of ηp<sup>2</sup> = .03), regardless of delay condition, though delayed JOLs showed higher resolution and recall (the delayed JOL effect). These null findings suggest JOLs are not significantly influenced by subliminal stimuli under the tested conditions (50 ms exposure, younger adults), highlighting potential limits to implicit memory's role in metamemory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of General Psychology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2026.2647733
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit memory and judgments of learning: testing the boundarie of subliminal influence

Pradeep Ramanathan, André Lindsey
The Journal of General Psychology
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Implicit memory and judgments of learning: testing the boundarie of subliminal influence

Pradeep Ramanathan, André Lindsey
article en

Abstract

Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are prospective metamemory judgments critical for intentional learning, and have been theorized to be, in part, supported by implicit memory processes. This study tested the boundaries of subliminal implicit memory's influence on JOLs by presenting masked primes, antiprimes, and neutral stimuli either before encoding (Pre-Study) or before JOL elicitation (Pre-JOL) in 96 neurotypical undergraduates across the two presentation conditions (<i>n</i> = 48 each). We assessed JOL calibration, resolution, recall accuracy, and reaction times. Subliminal stimuli showed no effects (equivalence testing, <i>p</i> < .01, with an equivalence bound of ηp<sup>2</sup> = .03), regardless of delay condition, though delayed JOLs showed higher resolution and recall (the delayed JOL effect). These null findings suggest JOLs are not significantly influenced by subliminal stimuli under the tested conditions (50 ms exposure, younger adults), highlighting potential limits to implicit memory's role in metamemory.

The Journal of General Psychology
Nevada State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.