Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established technique for the curative resection of large colorectal lesions; however, intraoperative bleeding remains a major technical challenge. Electrosurgical coagulation modes are modifiable procedural factors that may influence bleeding control and procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of Swift and Spray coagulation modes during colorectal ESD. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 594 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2021 and December 2025. Patients were divided into the Spray and Swift coagulation groups according to the coagulation mode used during submucosal dissection. Procedural characteristics, intraoperative and delayed bleeding, perforation rates, and other adverse events were analyzed and compared between groups. Results: Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the Spray coagulation group compared with the Swift coagulation group (42.2±23.7 vs 51.7±31.9 minutes, p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1865761
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Ömer Küçükdemirci, Halil Şahin, İsmail Taşkıran et al.
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Ömer Küçükdemirci, Halil Şahin, İsmail Taşkıran, Altay KANDEMİR, Müge Erdem Çağı, Berk Baş
article en

Abstract

Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established technique for the curative resection of large colorectal lesions; however, intraoperative bleeding remains a major technical challenge. Electrosurgical coagulation modes are modifiable procedural factors that may influence bleeding control and procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of Swift and Spray coagulation modes during colorectal ESD. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 594 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2021 and December 2025. Patients were divided into the Spray and Swift coagulation groups according to the coagulation mode used during submucosal dissection. Procedural characteristics, intraoperative and delayed bleeding, perforation rates, and other adverse events were analyzed and compared between groups. Results: Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the Spray coagulation group compared with the Swift coagulation group (42.2±23.7 vs 51.7±31.9 minutes, p

Journal of Medicine and Palliative CareVol. 7(2)
Istanbul Aydın University (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of swift versusspray coagulation on procedural outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection — Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Ömer Küçükdemirci, et al. · Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS