Balancing climate action for greater transport decarbonization: An avoid-shift-improve driven network data envelopment analysis framework

Transport decarbonisation requires allocating limited resources across competing strategies. The Avoid–Shift–Improve framework categorises these strategies to reduce transport's reliance on fossil fuels. This study develops an Avoid–Shift–Improve driven network data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework to measure county-level progress toward transport decarbonisation. The framework also serves as a decision-support tool for allocating resources efficiently to advance transport decarbonisation. Using data from Ireland's 26 counties, we integrate DEA with a Stackelberg leader–follower game and the best–worst method. The DEA component provides an objective, mathematically defined measure of relative efficiency. The best–worst method incorporates expert judgement on the economic and environmental impact of actions within the Avoid–Shift–Improve hierarchy. This hierarchical approach, reflecting expert consensus, prioritises transformational measures that reduce travel demand (Avoid), followed by strategies that shift remaining trips to low-carbon modes (Shift), while technological improvements (Improve) play a more limited role. Results reveal disparities in county performance. Dublin leads due to its relatively well-developed public transport and active mobility infrastructure. Smaller counties such as Longford and Leitrim also perform strongly despite their rural character. By contrast, large-area counties including Cork, Mayo, and Kerry underperform, reflecting structural challenges of dispersed settlement and high car dependency. The analysis highlights that larger counties achieve lower efficiency scores, while links with emissions and expenditure are weaker, underscoring the role of spatial scale and carbon lock-in in shaping outcomes. The framework is scalable to other regional and national contexts and can support economically rational, socially inclusive climate policy. • Develops a network DEA model for hierarchical importance of subunits in parallel structure. • Employs the Avoid–Shift–Improve framework to assess transport decarbonisation progress. • Integrates DEA, Stackelberg game, and BWM to evaluate emission-reduction strategies. • Prioritises and harmonises transport climate actions to maximise decarbonisation gains. • Provides a decision-support tool for policy-driven transport decarbonisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109322
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing climate action for greater transport decarbonization: An avoid-shift-improve driven network data envelopment analysis framework

Brian Caulfield, Keyvan Hosseini, Saeed Assani, Agnieszka Stefaniec et al.
Energy Economics
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Balancing climate action for greater transport decarbonization: An avoid-shift-improve driven network data envelopment analysis framework

Brian Caulfield, Keyvan Hosseini, Saeed Assani, Agnieszka Stefaniec, Anna Charly, Philippos Papaphilippou
article en

Abstract

Transport decarbonisation requires allocating limited resources across competing strategies. The Avoid–Shift–Improve framework categorises these strategies to reduce transport's reliance on fossil fuels. This study develops an Avoid–Shift–Improve driven network data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework to measure county-level progress toward transport decarbonisation. The framework also serves as a decision-support tool for allocating resources efficiently to advance transport decarbonisation. Using data from Ireland's 26 counties, we integrate DEA with a Stackelberg leader–follower game and the best–worst method. The DEA component provides an objective, mathematically defined measure of relative efficiency. The best–worst method incorporates expert judgement on the economic and environmental impact of actions within the Avoid–Shift–Improve hierarchy. This hierarchical approach, reflecting expert consensus, prioritises transformational measures that reduce travel demand (Avoid), followed by strategies that shift remaining trips to low-carbon modes (Shift), while technological improvements (Improve) play a more limited role. Results reveal disparities in county performance. Dublin leads due to its relatively well-developed public transport and active mobility infrastructure. Smaller counties such as Longford and Leitrim also perform strongly despite their rural character. By contrast, large-area counties including Cork, Mayo, and Kerry underperform, reflecting structural challenges of dispersed settlement and high car dependency. The analysis highlights that larger counties achieve lower efficiency scores, while links with emissions and expenditure are weaker, underscoring the role of spatial scale and carbon lock-in in shaping outcomes. The framework is scalable to other regional and national contexts and can support economically rational, socially inclusive climate policy. • Develops a network DEA model for hierarchical importance of subunits in parallel structure. • Employs the Avoid–Shift–Improve framework to assess transport decarbonisation progress. • Integrates DEA, Stackelberg game, and BWM to evaluate emission-reduction strategies. • Prioritises and harmonises transport climate actions to maximise decarbonisation gains. • Provides a decision-support tool for policy-driven transport decarbonisation.

Energy Economics
University of Liverpool (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Southampton (GB), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.