A Within Canopy Deposition Model Capturing the Influence of Microplastic Size, Biological Cohesion, and Vegetation‐Generated Turbulence

Abstract Laboratory experiments investigated how the presence of biofilm and particle size influenced deposition in both bare and vegetated channels. Both abiotic and biotic sediment beds were considered, with the biotic beds containing Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS). As current magnitude and turbulent kinetic energy increased, particles were more easily resuspended, leading to reduced deposition rate. At the same turbulence level, depositing particles smaller than the sediment grains exhibited higher deposition rates than larger particles because the smaller particles were more effectively shielded from the flow by settling deeper into the spaces between sediment grains. Increasing the concentration of EPS decreased the deposition rate for all particle types, but this trend was more pronounced for smaller particles, because the enhancement in particle exposure due to EPS was more significant. A new model was developed to describe microparticle deposition probability as a function of EPS concentration, flow characteristics, and particle properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120486
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Within Canopy Deposition Model Capturing the Influence of Microplastic Size, Biological Cohesion, and Vegetation‐Generated Turbulence

Heidi Nepf, Hyoungchul Park
Geophysical Research Letters
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

A Within Canopy Deposition Model Capturing the Influence of Microplastic Size, Biological Cohesion, and Vegetation‐Generated Turbulence

Heidi Nepf, Hyoungchul Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract Laboratory experiments investigated how the presence of biofilm and particle size influenced deposition in both bare and vegetated channels. Both abiotic and biotic sediment beds were considered, with the biotic beds containing Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS). As current magnitude and turbulent kinetic energy increased, particles were more easily resuspended, leading to reduced deposition rate. At the same turbulence level, depositing particles smaller than the sediment grains exhibited higher deposition rates than larger particles because the smaller particles were more effectively shielded from the flow by settling deeper into the spaces between sediment grains. Increasing the concentration of EPS decreased the deposition rate for all particle types, but this trend was more pronounced for smaller particles, because the enhancement in particle exposure due to EPS was more significant. A new model was developed to describe microparticle deposition probability as a function of EPS concentration, flow characteristics, and particle properties.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(7)
Gangneung–Wonju National University (KR), Kangwon National University (KR), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.