Your Message Matters: How Its Focus and Tone Affect the Level of Conflict Personalization

Taking conflict at work personally is associated with a decrease in well-being and more suboptimal conflict management behavior. Drawing from literature on workplace conflict, conflict expression, and employee voice, we explored how the focus (solution vs. problem) and tone (constructive vs. destructive) of a message influence message recipients’ level of conflict personalization. In a vignette study ( n = 683), we asked participants to identify with a task-related workplace conflict, communicated through email. Results supported our two hypotheses: Both a problem focus and a destructive tone resulted in higher levels of conflict personalization. There was no significant interaction of focus and tone on conflict personalization. Additional analyses revealed that message tone had a significantly stronger effect on conflict personalization than message focus. This study is a first step in understanding communication-related antecedents of conflict personalization at work. It provides workplace conflict- and voice scholars with recommendations for future research and uncovers potential organizational interventions to improve (digital) conflict communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884261424735
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Your Message Matters: How Its Focus and Tone Affect the Level of Conflict Personalization

Maria T. M. Dijkstra, Karin Kee, Lilian M. Hoogenboom, Bianca Beersma et al.
International Journal of Business Communication
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Your Message Matters: How Its Focus and Tone Affect the Level of Conflict Personalization

Maria T. M. Dijkstra, Karin Kee, Lilian M. Hoogenboom, Bianca Beersma, Kim J. P. M. van Erp
article en

Abstract

Taking conflict at work personally is associated with a decrease in well-being and more suboptimal conflict management behavior. Drawing from literature on workplace conflict, conflict expression, and employee voice, we explored how the focus (solution vs. problem) and tone (constructive vs. destructive) of a message influence message recipients’ level of conflict personalization. In a vignette study ( n = 683), we asked participants to identify with a task-related workplace conflict, communicated through email. Results supported our two hypotheses: Both a problem focus and a destructive tone resulted in higher levels of conflict personalization. There was no significant interaction of focus and tone on conflict personalization. Additional analyses revealed that message tone had a significantly stronger effect on conflict personalization than message focus. This study is a first step in understanding communication-related antecedents of conflict personalization at work. It provides workplace conflict- and voice scholars with recommendations for future research and uncovers potential organizational interventions to improve (digital) conflict communication.

International Journal of Business Communication
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Your Message Matters: How Its Focus and Tone Affect the Level of Conflict Personalization — Maria T. M. Dijkstra, Karin Kee, et al. · International Journal of Business Communication (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS