Market frictions, ambiguity and asset pricing: evidence from China

We study the implications of ambiguity under arbitrage constraints and in a market dominated by retail investors to understand its impact on asset pricing. We propose a novel approach to empirically measure stock level ambiguity and analyse how ambiguity-averse investors respond to varying levels of market ambiguity. In contrast to the previous research, we find a positive ambiguity premium. We attribute this to investors’ underreaction caused by the presence of significant market frictions in China. The results are robust across different factor models, alternative measure of market ambiguity, and varied portfolio formation approaches. Our findings suggest that ambiguity could be an important missing factor that could explain the much-debated high equity risk premium puzzle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-026-01508-7
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market frictions, ambiguity and asset pricing: evidence from China

Binsheng Qian, Sunil S. Poshakwale, A Mandal
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Market frictions, ambiguity and asset pricing: evidence from China

Binsheng Qian, Sunil S. Poshakwale, A Mandal
article en

Abstract

We study the implications of ambiguity under arbitrage constraints and in a market dominated by retail investors to understand its impact on asset pricing. We propose a novel approach to empirically measure stock level ambiguity and analyse how ambiguity-averse investors respond to varying levels of market ambiguity. In contrast to the previous research, we find a positive ambiguity premium. We attribute this to investors’ underreaction caused by the presence of significant market frictions in China. The results are robust across different factor models, alternative measure of market ambiguity, and varied portfolio formation approaches. Our findings suggest that ambiguity could be an important missing factor that could explain the much-debated high equity risk premium puzzle.

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Coventry University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Market frictions, ambiguity and asset pricing: evidence from China — Binsheng Qian, Sunil S. Poshakwale, et al. · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS